Message from @HyperGrapes
Discord ID: 687071057202774070
And Venice and its surroundings are much harder to dfened because tanks could be effectively deployed by the Entente
Unless the central powers at that point build some tanks too giving them more of an offensive capability
But I wouldn't know by when they would be able to have tanks or if they even would make any if they give up the Rhineland
I mostly think that the war could be "won" by staying on the defense and making it supremely painfull manpower wise to advance further on the central powers
After which you would have to gradually get Entente members to drop out with token concessions
The real question would be when the first major participant after America drops out the war
I think Italy and France are too belligerent to give up easily, Italy because of the sunk cost fallacy, France because it would hold the Rhineland
So I think the first one after America to go simply because of war weariness would be Britain through a negotiated peace
Say they get Germany's colonies or whatever and something from the Ottomans
If Britain is out so is Belgium imo
Japan would also drop out easily for German colonies in the Pacific and Tsingtau
Leaving only France and Italy as major participants
this chat
bottom text
Anybody here has some good books/articles about ancient Greeks and their culture? Particularly something that provides counter argument for their homo-society narrative.
I need an antidote for a fa8 of a "professor" of mine.
Greater Georgia
@TheEternalSearcher π π huh. where is greater armenia
I have not found a map that includes all the territory that Armenia claimed. I had a similar problem with Greece but i made my own map there:
Agree
They never had, I suppose, the Byzantine Realm had tons of minorities. Nowadays, however, in the age of majority rule, nation states and national self-determination, you cannot get away with this anymore
One advantage of monarchism was that the monarch was often a foreigner. Some didn't speak their national tongue (think Frederick the Great) or followed a foreign culture. In any case, ruling families were usually, to some extent, cosmopolitan. That eased a lot of tension.
At least back in the day they could rely on Greek as a lingua Franca and orthodoxy and the sort of imperial loyalty/myth to smooth over the rest
If they were going to retake all of Turkey today they would have to basically conscript their entire population just to keep it
You could do away with the Kurdish part and let Armenians have some of the clay too. Maybe invite other orthodox people
Still it's more realistic that the bulk of Turkey be governed by a variety of nations that actually have the capacity to hold it with the coast etc. going to Greece
Assyrians would also be glad to grab some land in southern Anatolia
Hot take
The Commissar order was justified
A similar contemporary Jewish group in Germany was the German Vanguard (Der deutsche Vortrupp), a group of German-Jewish followers of Hitler led by Hans-Joachim Schoeps,[1] also referred to as "Nazi Jews". Schoeps went into exile in Falun, Sweden in 1938. His two sons were born there. Schoeps returned to Germany after the war and was made professor of religious history at the University of Erlangen in northern Bavaria, ten miles north of Nuremberg. He remained a monarchist and wanted to re-introduce the monarchy in post-war West Germany. His involvement in the Vortrupp and his personal engagement for the success of the Nazi movement did not become known at Erlangen until 1970. He was firmly opposed to the liberal-socialist student movement after 1967, and published a book in 1972 in which he claimed that Germany was threatened by anarchy.
if he was a monarchist i dont think its fair to call him a not-see, but whatever
oh wait it says followers of hitler
i guess thats fair then
but Im pretty certain Hitler was against monarchy
π€
monarchist yew following Hitler
I dont quite get it
maybe he thought it to be a pragmatic alliance against the communists
Is there a wiki page on this?
yeah