I believe that most of the non Euro admixture in cyprus actually isnt due to phoenician but instead from Neolithic Anatolians/Caucasus peoples.

They have like 4 Asiatic groups with 20.000 population in total and a lot of them have russian admixture.

Neolithic Anatolians would be basically white

@TheEternalSearcher 𐠊𐠔 Very small

I'd expect most of Cyprus' admixture to come from it being a trade hub since the bronze age

fair number of it is yes

but not the bulk

I don't Remember the number exactly I must look it up

Regarding Anatolians I'd like to look up eventually if the Hittites were white

I remember hearing Anatolian farmers descended from the Natufians

Was that revised or what

Anatolian farmers were originally from the fertile crescent and were pushed north by the Semites.

Correct

So they're not from Iran like the Z93 arrow implies

Sumerians were probably anatolian farmers or closely related to them

Aren't Sumerians a language isolate

Nvm Elamites

Yes, but that is not means much

@Mr. Nessel @TheEternalSearcher 𐠊𐠔 Interesting thing is that Dravidians are just like Indo Aryans, invaders from the west, not indigenous, originally they were farmers from Iran possibly related to Elamites. the Indigenous peoples are Veddoids.

I thought Dravidians are native to India and got displaced by Indo Aryans in the North

I'm sure they're related somehow to population in Iran somehow

Because afaik there were Dravidian enclaves in Iran or Pakistan

They are as native to the subcontinent as the Inuit who invaded from Siberia and killed off the Dorset natives are native to the Americas.

Interesting

When they conquered the subcontinent most of them admixed with the Veddoids

Most of their DNA is Veddoid

Circassians and Kartvelians are both direct descendant of the caucasian hunter gatherers but belong to unique language families

Remember guys agriculture and reading is degenerate

Yeah. Embrace your ancestors from the step
EEFs were a bunch of matriarchal simps

The arrows are migrations of Arians(proto-Iranians) in the levant

Most of the Aryans who showed up in India were men.

(that's what violent conquest tends to look like in the genetic record)

A good way to look at the northern middle east (Turkey, North western Iran north iraq & syria) is as giant genetic bridge of the Caucasoid race (North Africans, Europeans, South Asians).

Yeah I see them as our equivalent to the Bering bridge

I saw an interesting video lecture about the early Indo-Europeans once. The professor joked that you could make the case that the IEs were proto-hippies because they may have cultivated psychedelic drugs, and about 1/4 of Scythian warrior graves were female.

lmao

Idk hunter gatherers and EEF fit more in with it in my mind

hunter gatherers because nature worship and tree huggers

EEF because matriarchal peasants who got conquered by the archetypal conquerer people

Weaklings basically