Its fine @AH-64

Bro I love Masaman. Good Stuff on Genetics

Same

I'll concede Malta is mediterranean. I must've misremembered or been confused because of Fst maps

I'll make sure to look up stuff for Cyprus again just to be sure I'm not talking nonsense

People are confusing Genetic cluster maps, admixture and haplogroups for all being the same thing and its very annoying. If we were to use haplogroups to determine what someone is then we would have to say that the pastoralists of Central west Africa are white since most of their haplogroup is R1B

I'm aware haplogroups aren't good for determining race, just migration patterns

And I know there are downsides to Fst but I must've gotten it mixed up nonetheless

By the way Uralics are more than 99%<European Caucasoid and less than 1%>Mongoloid, most of their Asiatic populations is dying out, so in my opinion is better to include all of them.

@Mr. Nessel Masaman posted a graph showing Cypriots something around 50-60% Euro admixture. I dont know where he got that from, Ill have to ask him his source for this.

Uralics are pretty heterogeneous so I'd have to look into them.

As in Uralics are a set of peoples

I'd expect admixtures etc. to vary

I remember some youtuber who is Cypriot Greek who had a lot of jewish ancestry. Was interesting

I believe that most of the non Euro admixture in cyprus actually isnt due to phoenician but instead from Neolithic Anatolians/Caucasus peoples.

They have like 4 Asiatic groups with 20.000 population in total and a lot of them have russian admixture.

Neolithic Anatolians would be basically white

@TheEternalSearcher 𐠊𐠔 Very small

I'd expect most of Cyprus' admixture to come from it being a trade hub since the bronze age

fair number of it is yes

but not the bulk

I don't Remember the number exactly I must look it up

Regarding Anatolians I'd like to look up eventually if the Hittites were white

I remember hearing Anatolian farmers descended from the Natufians

Was that revised or what

Anatolian farmers were originally from the fertile crescent and were pushed north by the Semites.

Correct

So they're not from Iran like the Z93 arrow implies

Sumerians were probably anatolian farmers or closely related to them

Aren't Sumerians a language isolate

Nvm Elamites

Yes, but that is not means much

@Mr. Nessel @TheEternalSearcher 𐠊𐠔 Interesting thing is that Dravidians are just like Indo Aryans, invaders from the west, not indigenous, originally they were farmers from Iran possibly related to Elamites. the Indigenous peoples are Veddoids.

I thought Dravidians are native to India and got displaced by Indo Aryans in the North

I'm sure they're related somehow to population in Iran somehow

Because afaik there were Dravidian enclaves in Iran or Pakistan

They are as native to the subcontinent as the Inuit who invaded from Siberia and killed off the Dorset natives are native to the Americas.

Interesting

When they conquered the subcontinent most of them admixed with the Veddoids

Most of their DNA is Veddoid