Message from @Felix the Monarchist
Discord ID: 697206411620515883
Depends. You can dry fruit which makes it last longer and supplement with meat
And in warmer regions with year round growing conditions you can plant and eat as you need
Unless there's not enough space for it
Space or too much population pressure
Also fish
There's also another problem with making fruits your main source of nutrients. To get the same amount of food you would get via grains you would need quite a lot more space which makes it a lot harder to defend. And growing a tree takes a lot longer then growing wheat so if something happens to your food production like a fire you would need many years to rebuild.
> https://voiceofeurope.com/2020/04/austria-rejects-migrant-quotas-backs-hungary-czechia-and-polands-strict-asylum-policies/ seen that felix
@DarkEagle553 Yeah I already heard of it. But we already took to many in the past.
Yeah
At least he is not cucking on that
Has cucked on to many
If he cucks on that he is done i think
Its quite funny that now the left cant complain because they would hurt the greens too.
yeah bit quiet
But hey nobody is talking about anything besides the wuhflue
The whole response to the crisis is gonna hurt them a lot probably Not because they were inefficient or anything like that but everyone is gonna blame them for the results like high unemployment.
They got to keep sacrificing children for their master Moloch
BASED texas
Oh fail sorry misread the tweet
Thats great news
Potatoes beat grain.
Potatoes are miracle food
Potatoes go with everything.
They especially go well with more potatoes.
ok Irish
ROUND 2
FIGHT
<:shot:513859859079364618>
RIP
Man, this remake of The Stand is so bizarre and unrealistic
@Mac
I'll keep this short, because I think I said all I had to say yesterday, and reiterating our arguments won't do any good. There's this bit I want to comment on:
>Do you know what that means? They are admitting to the fact that these people are not white but since these Arabs maintained Christianity in there heavily Islamic homeland's they are gotten the "honorary" status.
I know that it implies they aren't white per se, but it also means they'd like them to be white, because of our shared religion (and thus culture). You don't give an honorary title to someone completely unworthy of the real title. You might name someone an honorary general if he has shown himself a capable commander, but stands outside the military hierarchy, for example. If you give it to someone who never had combat experience and never saw a military in his life, that would be odd (I suspect honorary degrees from universities work just that way, but my point stands, because the practice is odd). An honorary title is like an allegory to an actual title.
Granted, the fact they're called "honorary whites" does mean they're not "actual whites". It does suggest that there is more to whiteness than genotype or phenotype, however. Now, you admitted as much now, and that is pretty much what I wanted: For you (not you personally, but the people who commented here) to
That brings us to what I see as the *real* problem with ethnocentrism: If ethnicity is as multicausal as it gets, stemming from no less than five underlying factors, then I don't see how you can determine ethnicity non-arbitrarily, and that, in turn, means all your categories are arbitrary.
Not so short after all, my bad.
Anyway:
It is not just that Iranians are "blue" and Scots are "red", and that there is a spectrum running from Iranians to Scots, but that you have five different, non-commensurate factors by which you could construct either point on the spectrum as well as the spectrum itself.
The reason why the obvious cases are so clear that you can use them to lead my argument ad absurdum is that there, you only have to look at genotype and phenotype, two factors extremely closely linked. This eliminates all arbitrariness. I am talking of the cases of comparing negroes and any european race, or, for that matter, any european race and australian aborigines. Here, the genetic and phenotypical differences alone are sufficient to construct the spectrum.
In other words, you use two methods for determining ethnicity, one for the groups with extremely obvious geno- and phenotypical differences, and one for the groups where that is not the case.
Then don't complain about him burning down churches tbqh