Message from @AH-64
Discord ID: 702243603371786361
LoL, Socialism is collective ownership of the means of production. That's even the normie definition.
I think he actually denied the natsocs were Prussian socialists though
@Mr.Fisch(炫龙) Because it's the consensus
You all have the same notion with different nuances
Yes
That's also my definition
The actual normie definition is Norway is socialism
Which lolberts agree with actually
Lolbert demsoc horseshoe confirmed
Cringe
National socialism even has some czech influences, if you ask me. I can't be too specific because I have yet to read Jan Hus
Hitler had a mixed economy with some corporatist elements thrown in.
imagine thinking Norway is socialist 🤣
Lol
The party when Hitler joined it barely has anything to do with what he shaped it to be
Kicking out the Strasserist element fundamentally transformed the party
Hitler was a bit of a wildcard, yeah
Yeah, seemingly still didn't watch the vid 😂
Remember the party when he joined just was very small
No shit
He vetoed plans to nationalize several key industries, too. Chemistry for example. Otherwise, we wouldn't be having this discussion for very long
I've watched many of TIKs videos
Don't assume everyone will fall for that shit
He also had a certain respect for organic development, probably reinforced by Feder
That's the thing. Treating economic theory like dogma will ALWAYS hinder you and limit your options.
whos TIK
you mean TIK TOK?
Judging Goebbels by his rhetoric, for example, he didn't. He sounded almost exactly like a Marxist revolutionary
If nationalizing was the best option economically for my country I wouldn't oppose it
I will never be as dogmatic about private enterprise and nationalization as lolberts
If
Lmao what is that
It's jsut like socialism because race the proletariat or something
Really capitalism is just libertarian socialism except the proletariat is replaced with capitalists
And the nonstates hands it all to that class
See that retardation
>It's jsut like socialism because race the proletariat or something
For real, kinda this
Reject capitalism
return to feudalism
Oh misread that
A state acting in the interest of a group when not even nationalizing the entire economy is not socialist
> Reject capitalism
> return to feudalism
@vexmasina44
Based
You gotta use that term properly and sparingly
Then no state would be socialist, however