but i feel like those tests arent made for me

they ask me a question and i have no problem argueing either way

same with the politiscales test or whatever it was called

@Shekel Stealer what was your score?

Same

My tension was homosexuality is unnatural and modern sanitation

@Fighting Gold

wait what

can you elaborate

So I said homosexuality is bad because it is unnatural

But I also said modern medicine and sanitation is good

It says its a conflict, but I don't believe it is

Homosexuality isn't only wrong because its unnatural

But that definitely is a factor

I don't think all unnatural things are wrong by default

oh ok

i avoided that contradiction

the naturalistic fallacy with the example of diseases being natural but still bad came to mind

im not against homo because its unnatural but because its bad for society

so i clicked disagree

I'm against it because its both

Human beings are obviously meant to be heterosexual

And being homosexual is bad for society

i got my contradiction from saying unnecessary damage to environment is bad but its fine if i take the car when i could take the train. my rationale is that taking the car is necessary because taking the train is inherently passive and feminine and itll get me corona. so theres no contradiction in my opinion

Living in a city is inherently passive and feminine

I think that is a contradiction

But I understand your concern for your safety rn with corona

>7
I got 41 <:GWcorbinTopKek:384871333705678868>

what do i put on the right to life question

What you believe

because white lives are important but not black and brown lives

Also lol @Bunyip

but it doesnt say white

so i should put disagree right

Just put what option most closely matches your belief

since it just says lives and not white lives

ima put disagree

what is the question

The right to life is so fundamental that financial considerations are irrelevant in any effort to save lives

financial considerations are relevant to black and brown lives