Now you have to play people for complexity.

Yes, it's CURRENTY inflexible.

Which is even harder.

The manufacturing is more flexible but the engineering is much harder.

I agree, AI is not inflexible.

AI right now is very much not what people think it is. It's very inflexible.

well thats the point Pratel

You replace 100's of builders, for a machine

And you keep the engineers working

You don't even do that.

You still need someone to survey and install.

Again, you're thinking big dumb robots, AI is not a big dumb robot. It's a robot that can learn for thousands of other robots.

Uh. I'm in AI.

It also has hard, dumb limits

AI is trained on very specific tasks at the moment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU

This make the argument much better than I can.

About robots.

Can you summarize it?

I can't just scan a video.

Don't

Watch it.

If this is yet another "robot cars are replacing truckers" and "Deepmind is going to create strong AI and replace humanity video"...

Not replace humanity.

But replace many if not most jobs.

If it's just "AI will replace jobs" argument, we've seen that since the Luddites.

It shifts the optimal point of the economy and people do other stuff.

Yes, this time is not the same.

Why is this not the same?

Watch the video?

It addresses that point.

I got a hunch I've heard it before.

And I don't have time to sit through a 15 minute CCP Grey video.

GCP

whatever.

If the argument is that this time their coming for the white collar jobs.

The Luddites were upset that automation was coming for farming and skilled manufacturing.

Okay fine, name a job that can't be automated.

They were sorta right. Not as many people farm any more and we don't line up 100s of people in a workshop to make firearms one-by-one anymore.

What's the job that we're moving people into.

But farming and skilled manufacturing is still around.

Arts for one.

I'm getting slowmo'd.