Message from @Schedrevka

Discord ID: 477908040381890580


2018-08-11 18:33:14 UTC  

anthropomorphized animal

2018-08-11 18:33:27 UTC  

Are Ewoks furries?

2018-08-11 18:33:27 UTC  

so it needs a real life counterpart?

2018-08-11 18:33:27 UTC  

different species imo

2018-08-11 18:33:46 UTC  

So, would you argue there's a distinction from an animal with human qualities

2018-08-11 18:33:48 UTC  

Ewoks are a different species imo

2018-08-11 18:33:57 UTC  

And a human with animal qualities?

2018-08-11 18:34:01 UTC  

Their real life counterpart is bird

2018-08-11 18:34:13 UTC  

as are Zora and Rita

2018-08-11 18:34:29 UTC  

They don't have a real life counterpart. They're given their wings by magic.

2018-08-11 18:34:38 UTC  

If you just took a picture of a rito and divorced it from its context in Zelda they would fit in perfectly well within furry shit

2018-08-11 18:34:58 UTC  

So if I took any furry character and gave it lore it would stop being furry?

2018-08-11 18:35:00 UTC  

humans dont have to be the only default intelligent life

2018-08-11 18:35:03 UTC  

If an Ewok is into humans and dresses like a human is that Ewok the equivalent to a furry?

2018-08-11 18:35:07 UTC  

at what point does something become furry? using rito as an example

is it the feathers, the beak, the talons on the toes

2018-08-11 18:35:28 UTC  

Furry defines a fetish isn't it?

2018-08-11 18:35:33 UTC  

They also absolutely have human form, not chicken legs or anything like that

2018-08-11 18:35:42 UTC  

Including hair.

2018-08-11 18:35:50 UTC  

Some of the Ninas from breath of fire are directly related to birds, are they furries?

2018-08-11 18:35:51 UTC  

The intent is what matters

2018-08-11 18:35:55 UTC  

More a subculture based on a common interest than just a fetish

2018-08-11 18:36:11 UTC  

There's lots of furry shit that isn't sexual, even if there is a TON of sexual furry shit

2018-08-11 18:36:17 UTC  

Unless the question is what are furries into

2018-08-11 18:37:12 UTC  

are humans furries because we're anthropomorphized monkeys?

2018-08-11 18:37:59 UTC  

That is why I say intent

2018-08-11 18:38:11 UTC  

Humans are already an animal

2018-08-11 18:38:14 UTC  

But you can't know the creator's intent

2018-08-11 18:38:45 UTC  

Two people could create the exact same thing and one could say 'it's furry' and the other not

2018-08-11 18:38:52 UTC  

yes

2018-08-11 18:39:17 UTC  

like mascots

2018-08-11 18:39:28 UTC  

Let's take it from a different angle, one of evolutionary development.

2018-08-11 18:39:28 UTC  

so what happens when the author never tells you? Is everything in a constant state of quantum furry because it's rarely explicitly stated?

2018-08-11 18:39:44 UTC  

How is it being used rather

2018-08-11 18:39:47 UTC  

schrodingers furry

2018-08-11 18:40:17 UTC  

But whether they evolved naturally or not is irrelevant to whether or not they're furry

2018-08-11 18:40:21 UTC  

Let's say you had the ability to change your own traits as you need to. Let's say you were wanting to physiologically change your body to be able to travel in, and live off of, the ocean.

2018-08-11 18:40:30 UTC  

They're clearly based on real life birds(primarily eagles)

2018-08-11 18:40:45 UTC  

not really

2018-08-11 18:40:46 UTC  

They're not really based on eagles.

2018-08-11 18:40:51 UTC  

idk how this is an argument, it takes 1 look at them to know theyre furry

2018-08-11 18:40:59 UTC  

Look at their adult beaks