Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 484066457295126538
I really need to switch my main browser...
Again a principle started before the Age of Reason
read the first paragraph
Historically, "philosophy" encompassed any body of knowledge.[14] From the time of Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle to the 19th century, "natural philosophy" encompassed astronomy, medicine, and physics.[15]
Again after the age of reason, this changed
The first paragraph does not label it a science
That is the first line in the second paragraph
Philosophical methods include questioning, critical discussion, rational argument, and systematic presentation.[7][8] Classic philosophical questions include: Is it possible to know anything and to prove it?[9][10][11] What is most real? Philosophers also pose more practical and concrete questions such as: Is there a best way to live? Is it better to be just or unjust (if one can get away with it)?[12] Do humans have free will?[13]
In the modern era, some investigations that were traditionally part of philosophy became separate academic disciplines, including psychology, sociology, linguistics, and economics.
if yo dont think those are the bases of science you failed
in philosophy and school
Again, it use to be that way
Are you giving me definitions that your phiosophy professor gave?
nope
so not even your philosophy teacher called it a science.
Right under the breakdown
This division is not obsolete but has changed. Natural philosophy has split into the various natural sciences, especially astronomy, physics, chemistry, biology, and cosmology. Moral philosophy has birthed the social sciences, but still includes value theory (including aesthetics, ethics, political philosophy, etc.). Metaphysical philosophy has birthed formal sciences such as logic, mathematics and philosophy of science, but still includes epistemology, cosmology and others.
see
Natural philosophy has split into the various natural sciences
can we get back on track to the original debate
A square is a rectangle, therefore all rectangles are squares.
before more ignorance is shown off
?
Even according to Khan's point
Which, I might add, you called me ignorant for
That is what you're arguing.
i was arguing about applied ethics
you came saying is not a science
which is false
Philosophy of science
Main article: Philosophy of science
This branch explores the foundations, methods, history, implications and purpose of science. Many of its sub-divisions correspond to a specific branch of science. For example, philosophy of biology deals specifically with the metaphysical, epistemological and ethical issues in the biomedical and life sciences. The philosophy of mathematics studies the philosophical assumptions, foundations and implications of mathematics.
Philosophy can be applied to science.
jesus fucking CHRIST
LMAO
That's literally what I see being said by Khan, correct me if I'm wrong.
a scientist is a philosopher first
if you cant udnerstand taht you are ignorant
Sure.
Because science ITSELF is philosophy.