Message from @RyeNorth
Discord ID: 488182015783337994
This is your own personal sect?
It’s what I think is the best of christianity
Note I think that I am only capable of doing this because of god but theres a whole lot in the bible all very important and much hard to understand
I've been saying for a while now, that I think the poles have shifted. We find ourselves aligning with people like Tim Pool and the like not due to the left/right definition, but due to authoritarian/libertarian differences.
It's a portion of the reason why people on the Libertarian side of things are finding themselves in agreement.
One of the key differences between Authoritarianism and Libertarianism is that Authoritarians want to bring about cultural change through policy, and Libertarians would rather see policy enforced by culture.
As per Globalization vs. Localization, that might be an interesting division point to bring up.
That seems to mean a lot more than an economic left/right sort of division.
I have trouble even trying to grasp the key differences on scale between what we call on a political compass 'Left' and 'Right'. It seems inaccurate as it stands.
same
and im struggling to understand why left libertarians are below the authoritarian line considering how much they usually want to regulate the market
Well, in that regard, it kind of makes sense.
You can believe in regulation of markets, but not of people.
no
markets are people
People who work in them are.
economics is another word for human action
But the corporations are not people in and of themselves.
i agree the legal definition is false, but they are a group of people ultimately
its not the building making decisions, its the people within it
a brand cant pick up a pen and write a signature on a form
I think I'm going to challenge you on it...
economics is a description of the results of people interacting with eachother when they trade value
Alright, that's a more sound definition than I was expecting...
It's just horseshoe theory in action. As you reach 'maximum liberty' you allow for others to build up their authority, or you do so yourself to force everyone to live in the way you envision as 'free'.
I still disagree with it vaguely, but not strongly enough to argue it.
I think I see a solution to this situational quagmire in what I call personal data corporations.
You basically start a surveillance company that studies everything about you, creates a singular data resource, and parcels out data for profit.
That sounds terrifying.
Orwell inside out, yep
my point is, if you regulate a minimum wage for example, it means you're gonna have to send cops with guns after employers when they make agreements with workers to pay for a certain amount. the policy have to be enforced against human beings. and those human beings may not necessarily have a problem working for below minimum wage, if it makes the difference between doing something and doing nothing.
but decentralization is the only way to defang the viper in question.
I suppose it's better than the fine print surveillance we submit to on a daily basis...
either take control of your data, or someone else will
if it's a corporate resource.... whole new set of laws if someone messes with it.
expensive laws.
I'm less concerned with Minimum Wage matters in regulation.
I'm far more concerned with truth in marketing.
An authority is needed in the market to assure against scams.
See I think the theoretical solution is basic income, which is utterly impractical. Which is why data income becomes a very appealing compromise to me.
alright then you understand how left libertarians are pretty strict and dominating in that regards