Message from @Beemann
Discord ID: 489153084497330197
5 proofs
Now notice how @Beemann instead of just acknowledging the reality of his religious views, and the many Atheist ideologies that have turned murderous, ro anything else, h e just keeps claiming his ideology is perfect and above reproach. Again, there is no reason for th ose of us who reject Atheism to care what these slimy abusive dishonest Atheists think, is there?
"Let me call all atheists bad people, then call them liars for saying pointing out you just called them a bad person, then say you never said they were a bad person"
Which was literally just an elaboration of Aquinas' 5 proofs
Also nice strawman
Please address my actual points, and not the ones you would rather deal with
Now @Beemann lies right in froint of everybody, where they can verify I gave multiple completely polite referencs to multiple sources, including multiple books and videos, and offered more. Why can't Beeman stop lying, even when everybody present can go verify he's lying?
You seem like the stereotypical smug self-important self-righteous atheist who just 'switched teams' without actually changing your thought process.
>you specifically references a particular book repeatedly
>you liar, I referenced multiple books
I'm not lying if there's no contradiction
The problem @Beemann appears to have is that I gave comletely neutral and polite answers to inquiries when asked for research and references. Everything I stated was social science data. But Beeman can't h andle it. I think it's the cognitive dissonance of having his cult ideology questioned.
Lol
>social science
>data
>Aquinas
Who's lying now?
I think it was him, or one of the others, who denied having father issues, then ran away crying saying I had insulted someone from a broken home--himself. Can't remember which of th ese Cultist Atheist Identitiarians did that, but it was also h ilarious. "I don't have father isseus! Waaah, you just hurt me and I come from a broken home!" It was hysterical.
I find it shameful that you would tarnish the good name of Maximilian Kolbe by acting this way.
All anyone has to do is scroll up and see @Beemann is aparently a genuine pathological liar: he really can't stop himself.
"I won't discuss things with you unless you read 5 proofs"
"How dare you criticize the book I demanded you read, and my position for supporting it on that foundation?"
@Schedrevka Nice try, but why would St. Max care about your opinion, and why would anyone believe you know anything about him? And why would anyone care about Shedrevka's moral opinions for that matter?
Does the Catholic Church support projection? Oh I guess they do go after pedophiles repeatedly don't they.
Don't worry, I'm sure supporting the most heathen sector of Christendom is the right answer
ROFLMAO. He was given multiple book references, multiple other links, and he still just won't back down and admit he got something wrong. He needs to just keep lying.
Keep having fun i n your ridicu lous little ideological bubble world.
Also, keep dodging the question you ca n't answer: why should those of us in the Non-Atheist Majority give a flying fcuk if his rights are violated or if his feelings are hurt? He can't answer it. None of them can.
I never claimed he would care. I only claimed that *I* care, and anyone who is a good person should care at least on some level what a stranger thinks. I know about him because I was raised Catholic, have respect for the Catholic teachings, and attended a church named after him for much of my life.
Are you breaking right now?
I'm curious @Schedrevka if you could tell me where I could find this parish you claim was named after St. Max?
Houston TX
Oh, that's cool, I'd love to go there. But in any case you obviously don't actually know jack shit about the man, or you'd know he was a fierce warrior against heresy. 😉
Also, I doubt very much your claim that you have any respect at all for the Church, given that you just sit there and let these people lie and abuse, @Schedrevka
Out of curiosity, are you an ethno nationalist? Because I'm getting some killer deja vu here
Wondering if it's same ideology or just same playbook really
Now @Beemann pulls out the tried and true technique of trying personal smearing, rather than just answering challenges or retracting false claims.
Not a smear
I debate ethno nationalists all the time
I don't really give a shit if you are one, I'm just noticing the same tired tactics
Yeah, total smear there from @Beemann who is desperately trying to change the subject away from his own demonstrated lies (just scroll up kids) and tries to psychoanalyze. Now he wants me to say "no I'm not an ethno-Nationalist!" so he can accuse me of being one anyway. But no, I'm not one, thanks for the smear. But I definitely smell SJW/Feminist behavior off of you, it's all you've done this conversation.
You are not a fierce warrior, you are a smug person on the internet doing harm to your own cause. I know these people to some extent and they have shown themselves to show respect to others who disagree with them and to their beliefs when they themselves are shown respect which you have not done. I never claimed respect for the church. I claimed respect for the teachings, and I have respect for the individuals within the church who live up to the teachings.
Nah, if you're not one that's fine
Feel free to get the last word on me.
It's that you have this pattern of read my thirty books into baseless insult into claiming your opponent is being dishonest
@Schedrevka [snort] My cause has been very successful so far, thanks. And it's obvious that you're a fraud or you would have called these abusive frauds and liars out. I suggest you have your dishonest cultish bigot friends start backing down and apologizing for their agbusive behavior and their lies.
Which is like shot for shot how my debates have gone with ethnonats
Now look how @Beemann pivots again, claims he was offered "30 books." No, all anyone has to do is look: was asked for proof. Gave book, and offered others. He whined like a little bitch that he sh ouldn't have to go all the way to a library and actuyally read a whole book. Typical of the Atheism Cultists.