Message from @RyeNorth
Discord ID: 495243534593425409
Not enough crying, fati
Do you believe her claims about airplanes?
😢
Is that better
I also have a fear of eating
no. That means she's not a credible witness
That doesn't mean she's lying on all counts
My family had to hold my hand last time i ate a burger
Do you beleive her claims it was 100% kavanaugh? do you beleieve her claims about location?
I'm convinced they both believe their own stories.
If she's not credible why are we even listeneing to her about kavanaugh?
You're arguing against perspectives not present
She was basically allowed to go before the nation and destroy a man's reputation regardless of her credibility
and you admitted she was not based on things we knew before she testified
Why do we put people on trial if they can just be found not guilty?
You're arguing against an irrational position.
We didn't get any new information
She provided it all by letter she did manage to stall the vote
The dems saw this worked and "new" allegation just started popping up demanding their own day at the hearing with more demands
As kavanaugh pointed out, she asked for anonymity.
She was lawyering up in august almost a month before the allegation came forward
This isn’t a trial this is a witch hunt
An anonymous accusation would have been worse
this is common is dem playbook see: trump, herman cain, clarence thomas. difference is the #metoo movement
in past we would not have allowed the circus without real evidence
in the mean time keith ellison wins elections
@Faticati I agree if they would have allowed it to remain anonymous it would have been worse
we have a right to face our accusers.
What I do not understand is why you want to destroy the accuser when you don't have to to make your case?
Apparently, we do because believe all women.
It's about as self destructive as saying 'boys will be boys' to dismiss the accusations
If Judge Kavanaugh doesn't get the nomination what job can he get?
Also why do we have to destroy the accuser?
I agree with you to an extent but that is a separate issue
regardless of whether he's put on scotus democrats are going to try to impeach him.
If the Dems weren't playing politics they would have investigated and nothing would have happened because she hasn't provided evidence.
Your stance is to burn the protection that burden of proof applies
what protection?
Lying to Congress is a crime
they crafted the accusation vague enough so she couldn't be jailed.