Message from @Grenade123
Discord ID: 506161576135360533
exactly, people will kick you off their property if you're using it to spout stuff they don't like
Your webserver is too small to matter.
good luck getting the same audience in your living room as you can reach online
But AT&T can't just deny phone service because if they did they could control democracy--Western Union actually did it once.
The internet is the new phone.
It's only too small too matter if I don't talk to people
Except it's even bigger and more important.
Is Jones gone?
He seems to still be able to harass a sitting politician
It's the phone service, the mail service, television, shopping and finance all at once.
These are all already regulated because of the potential for abuse.
And all (aside retail) are banned from simply discriminating for non-economic reasons.
All things the government is involved in, monitors, and uses to accuse me of terrorism and throw me in jail or put me on a drone hitlist
@Grenade123 And when his money runs out? He hasn't seemed too effective.
`So you think that they should just ban James Woods.` If James Woods acts in a way that without a shadow of a doubt violates the platforms terms of services I don't think alot of people would argue against. Only problem is the TOS are too vague for interpreation, selectively enforced and most times users are punished without a crime. If Twitter equally enforced their TOS they'd have maybe half of the daily active users tomorrow
Very good options: get kicked off a platform and stop having socialist yell at me, or get drone strikes.
"Drone strikes" has to be the slippery slope of the year.
Perhaps we should remove 230 so James woods can sue for their vauge terms
Not an argument Grenade.
Removing 230 is on the table.
Is it? Need I go find the list of America citizens Obama had killed for no reason? And Trump hasn't stopped?
But I'm not sure it would be enough. I think it would open up for the SPLC and well-heeled NGOs to just sue people they don't like to oblivion.
I guess Snowfen was a lair and they have none of those programs right?
We're talking about social media and internet censorship. Not military action.
Bullshit, all government action is military action
And you think somehow not regulating tech censorship somehow removes the NSA monitoring programs?
It won't. Law enforcement will do what it wants regardless.
Removing 230 means they have to stop banning oland editing or be open to be sued into oblivion
Because protection for platform was around to protect libraries before social media
See, you're right, but I also see it backfiring and really helping the really well-heeled organizations at the expense of everyone else.
Infact, 230 was enacted to protect platform censorship from lawsuit
Section 230 would need explicit reform. Something closer to common carrier, which is what I'm arguing.
You're just saying "repeal 230 and no regulation because it's governmnet"
You and Beemann...
No, because it is a bad law
I have less of a headache banging on an anvil. Atleast the anvil can bend and realize when it's wrong.
I'm agreeing. I'm saying "repeal" isn't enough.
A company wanted to censor curse words but not he considered a publisher.
Yes, I've seen your video.
230 was the only part of the entirely shit law to follow
Are you reading what I'm saying?