Message from @velvitonator
Discord ID: 506193052432334886
No, payment processors mitigate risk and volume
Or maybe that is steemit
and currently its only sources of income are shopify and startengine, both of which are likely to be lost as they rely on the same payment processors through a middleman
TBH I'm not gonna shed any tears over gab
mind's internal crypto is a failure
But there's nothing that really prevents it from operating
You could e.g. host it as a Tor service
network effects
the value of a cryptocurrency is directly dependent on the number of people using it, and the number of people using minds is directly dependent on having a means of making money using it.
Oh I agree, it's a problem
tor barely functions as is
To a degree, but there are also other factors
putting something like a major social media platform on it would cripple it
What we're seeing is the intensification of those other factors
Gab is not a major social media platform
We need to find the source of there not being a good alternative payment processor. Without identifing the roadblocks, you are not solving the problem.
Tor's capacity has also improved a lot over the past few years
Partly due to Snowden, likely
Meaning any regulation would be a bandaid
And that is very bad
Or at lest, something with most of the same properties
There's still likely a cash-out endpoint (for the near to medium future)
But at that point you're worried about e.g. banks stopping transfers because of your opinions
I can't say there's 0% chance of that, but they seem to be used to being hated
So probably are less susceptible to the sway of popular opinion
Corporations control our money (banks) and the government indirectly controls the banks. Without something decentralized, one of the two will always shut us down
If you go with regulation, you are giving a tool to the democrats when they get back into power
I don't think the banks are quite so helpless
They were able to get themselves those bailouts, after all
It's a highly regulated industries. Only take a law or two to basically nationalize them.
But like I said, one of the two will always be able to shut you down. Corporation or government
some sort of legislation preventing financial institutions from taking ideological stances might do the trick
I agree there's always a possibility
something such that they can't refrain from doing business with you just because they don't like your politics
There always was, is, and will be
It's more about making it relatively more difficult
In the limit, you could imagine crypto being outlawed
E.g. the ISP being required to report crypto traffic, or this being sufficient cause for a search
But at this point I think you're talking about a US that's far more totalitarian that it has ever been
So there might be more...pressing issues in such a world anyway