Message from @4AM_critter 🐉
Discord ID: 506207501851557903
I steer toward discouraging political discussion
That's the ideal solution, but there's a large contingent that feels it's a moral right to be open at all times.
We prepare for shootings and I have laid down the smack a few times when people have started down discussions about guns
@DrYuriMom Yeah. That's why I declare myself an Offensive Moderate. I am in the middle and offend everyone!
*highfives Khanclansith*
I've tried chasing politics out of chat boards and stuff for being off topic and the same people always come back poking and looking to politicize everything. It's universally the left in my experience.
Particularly the far left.
I try to hold incredibly extreme views as politely as possible.
My staff are mostly Republicans so I have to be careful. I let my apolitical mask drop the day after the 2016 election when i was practically hyperventilating in panic and I'm still working to recover trust. I just snapped about what it would mean for my family - it was a bad day. 😕
I think I'm your mirror image. I just went home early.
._.
How is your family?
We have some Dems who go on about gun control and I've stopped them a few times. It's just best not to talk about it at work.
Agreed.
If only it could be enforced.
Im curios now, have your co-workers expressed their attitudes towards milo?
My family is doing fine. Oregon is pretty good with GLBT acceptance, hence why I live here and won't leave.
But I do worry where things will go now that the judiciary is changing.
That's good.
I don't think it's going to change.
I will be quite curious to see where things land
What I can see, there is no plans to attack Rainbow rights. Rather the plan is to keep them on par with everyone else.
There's actually a rising "we don't care if they'd leave us alone" movement in the churches as I can tell.
So far, to the best of my knowledge, both new supreme court justices have a track record of maintaining to the rule of law as written and intended to the best of their understanding.
By any means, Obergefell would need to be directly challenged to be overturned.
I think it'll become permissible to discriminate and I don't necessarily see that as a bad thing (yes, I'm a traitor to my class for saying this)
It's much harder to challenge a law than to create one.
Compare and contrast that "Special Rights" demand from the CRTL-Left
Yeah, I agree, discrimination is becoming a serious problem in several facets of American life.
Like higher education. Or job hiring.
I'm fascinated to see someone who's sincerely distraught at Trump's election
It sounds like you really think they're out to get you
Actually, I'm talking about it from the right perspective.
What do you mean?
The right to not bake a cake for a GLBT or black person
The right to not hire someone on religious grounds
I see the potential for a lot more individual liberty to discriminate on religious grounds
I'm actually not against it on principle, but the execution may be scary
Those asshats that sued the baker in CO were asshats
Go somewhere else for your cake, nitwits