they can get a job w/o affirmative action, but they wont' get hiring preferences if you overturn UCLA vs. Bakke

salami

DEAR LORD SALAMI

WE ARE ARGUING POGROMS VERSUS ECONOMIC DEPRIVATION

the jews would stay even if they are some window cleaners

not just jews

goes for everyone

i'm okay with jews, as long as they don't control major institutions like courts, banks, media etc...

remove laws against discrimination vs make discrimination a law essentially

or at least thats what i am gathering as a lurker

AGREE WITH UCLA vs. BAKKE @Jossi

i think the non americans are mixing up civil rights and affirmative action. not the same thing. close but not the same. and jews are successful because of ingroup preferences

AGREED

PROBABLY NEED A FAQ ON THIS

LOL

yea i might write one

JEWS ARE SUCCESSFUL FOR MANY REASONS

ONE IS NATIVE ABILITY

i have to take this diversity training every year 🙄

AVERAGE IQ + STRONG WORK ETHIC

MISERY

NEPOTISM dammt

cumulative advantage

SPECIFIC MEASURES = PUSHBACK FOR CRUELTY

YOU WILL BE FIGHTING YOUR OWN PEOPLE AGAIN

FAIL IN THREE MOVES

People are reluctant to leave unless they fear for their safety or their survival.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_effect

If it is merely "inconvenient", it is brushed off usualy.

BUT REMOVING CIVIL RIGHTS WILL DO SO

usually*

YOU MISUNDERSTAND ARGUMENT @BlackSalami

IT IS REMOVE (1) AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (2) CIVIL RIGHTS (3) ANTI-DISCRIMINATION

wait wait wait, you're for removing their civil rights?

THAT WAS ALWAYS THE ARGUMENT

REMOVE CIVIL RIGHTS FOR EVERYONE

LAW ONLY BENEFITS THOSE WHO ARE MINORITIES

THAT IS HOW IT WAS WRITTEN

na zdrowie!

HFT

English mutherucker, do you speak it?