Message from @Cody

Discord ID: 507915304773353473


2018-11-02 13:48:34 UTC  

same reason we can't require having x arms or legs as people sometimes don't. but we still count them as human

2018-11-02 13:48:52 UTC  

But that fertilized egg has it's own unique set of dna

2018-11-02 13:49:11 UTC  

Completely separate from whatever entity's created it

2018-11-02 13:49:19 UTC  

So its life

2018-11-02 13:49:34 UTC  

incorrect. it has half and half.

2018-11-02 13:49:46 UTC  

or in the case of incest, it can be a clone

2018-11-02 13:49:59 UTC  

rare and require mother son or father daughter

2018-11-02 13:50:09 UTC  

but can be

2018-11-02 13:50:31 UTC  

I mean sure.

2018-11-02 13:51:13 UTC  

But that really doesn't change my point though. It's a completely separate thing from the parents.

2018-11-02 13:51:28 UTC  

Be those parents the same person or not

2018-11-02 13:51:52 UTC  

And its unlikely to be an exact clone

2018-11-02 13:52:01 UTC  

unlikely, but if it was, would it not have life?

2018-11-02 13:52:07 UTC  

obviously not but why?

2018-11-02 13:52:14 UTC  

So unlikely that it's on the scale of impossible

2018-11-02 13:52:28 UTC  

not really

2018-11-02 13:52:48 UTC  

Babies constantly mutate in minor ways

2018-11-02 13:53:15 UTC  

if you have a daughter, half her DNA is from her father. There is probably closer to a 1/4 chance of any give egg being the same set of dna the egg that made her was

2018-11-02 13:53:37 UTC  

But DNA mutates often

2018-11-02 13:53:45 UTC  

In reproductive cells

2018-11-02 13:54:05 UTC  

The chances are closer to 1/1000000

2018-11-02 13:54:30 UTC  

And agian that really doesn't change my point

2018-11-02 13:54:52 UTC  

if that was the case, then genetic diseases would have a much lower chance of being passed on than they do

2018-11-02 13:54:56 UTC  

Just becuase it can't grow to be old does not mean that the cell is itself dead

2018-11-02 13:55:00 UTC  

but this is all off topic

2018-11-02 13:55:04 UTC  

The cell lives for a time

2018-11-02 13:55:21 UTC  

yes, but thats part of the problem.

2018-11-02 13:56:16 UTC  

So, if you remove a sperm cell or fertilized egg cell from a female, it will not live to 9 months

2018-11-02 13:56:40 UTC  

agreed?

2018-11-02 13:57:09 UTC  

same goes for a zygote, which is like fertilized egg 2.0

2018-11-02 13:57:56 UTC  

now, a fetus could, if you removed it at somewhere around 7 months. it would have low odds, but it could live to 9 months

2018-11-02 13:58:41 UTC  

It wont survive.

2018-11-02 13:59:05 UTC  

not true, premature babies start having a 50% chance of surviving around then i think

2018-11-02 13:59:10 UTC  

Dont really see where your going with this.

2018-11-02 13:59:17 UTC  

not without help but then again neither does a 1 year old

2018-11-02 13:59:26 UTC  

I was answering your question

2018-11-02 13:59:37 UTC  

ah

2018-11-02 13:59:49 UTC  

so it won't survive

2018-11-02 14:00:12 UTC  

not without a female

2018-11-02 14:00:33 UTC  

Still dont see how that means that by outlawing abortion we would be outlawing masturbation?

2018-11-02 14:03:10 UTC  

not saying it would, but i'm not talking about outlawing. Its about what is considered human life, and therefore what is moral to kill and immoral to kill. and why. Its pretty clear why killing in self defense is moral when you don't have an option. most people don't view masturbation as killing although you are killing sperm cells as you made a choice.