He has property rights and the company is a extension of them but it does not have rights itself

How the business is managed and who owns it is a bit more complicated

And the State has sovreign rights...

Elaborate

it has the right to enforce the law for all citizen and to punish the people that violate the law. In some cases throw those people out.

Thats not a right its a purpose we gave it

Just as a company can earn profit it does not have a right to earn profit but its its purpose

Rights are limits placed on the government by the governed

I would argue against that but you probably define rights a different way

The gouvernment still has the right to determine who lives in it and who doesn't.

It has the ability

It doesnt have a right to do that

Not the right

Define rights so I know you are talking about

^

A right is something you have and can sue others if they violate it.

?

Thats a very collective definition

That means to you rights are fluid

Also society determines the rights

and something nobody can take from you.

Mine is rights come in these forms that exist from what humans need to live

So life can't be a right because if someone kills you, you can't sue them :^)

Invariably all Rights could be taken away, quite easily.

They must be able to own property think which speech is a extension of this pursue happiness life liberty

These are all requirements of humans survival

Individual, exclusive property is not a survival requirement. Groups have owned property for ages

Sure but people who havent produced relied on the other man who did

Or thought

One can find a cave based on percepts but to build shelter he must think

@Beemann

The people who unfocus their mind and dont think or produce are subhuman to add to that to produce one must be able to think

You don't require all that much beyond the basics to survive though. That's why many traditions last as long as they do- there's no need to change them. It wasn't necessarily to build a car, for instance, even though the impact of automobiles has been massive

@Beemann Except it improved the quality of life

Which we need to survive

Ultimately though rights must be restrictions placed on the larger social order for the sale of the individual

You don't need cars to survive

Well its more complicated

Either way it improves the quality of life

Sure, I'm just pointing out the difference between "necessary to survive" and "an improvement"

I would argue that personal, exclusive property is good, but it isn't necessary for survival