that's what the far left would have you believe

Nope. Black pill means you're politically aware but do not believe anything can be done to fix the problems.

We're at a point where the term "Red Pill" is used conveniently for ideology

It means that you start thinking for yourself and see the truth, get off the plantation

I'm saying terms are used that stem away from their actual meaning

like "Racist" or "Bigot"

yes, red pill is none of them.

racist/bigot is person not identify with the hard left, that the hard left disagrees with the,.

while the actual racist and bigots are the ones throwing around that term...

And I'm saying Red Pill is starting to lose its meaning by people using it for their own ideology

I'm not saying they're aren't genuine Red Pills

just got here but yeah red pill is misused a lot

red pill is supposed to be the state of no ideology, not replacing one map for another

and its something to constantly renew as well, its easy to get set in our ways and grow rigid and not accept new information and adapt to it

Have any of you seen this ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-X94TPrzWsI

on it's own it's just as bad as the real one, in context... yeah... nothing false in there from what i can tell

If consumers have the right to boycott companies, companies should have the right boycott consumers. Leftists: capitalism for me but not for thee.

Cakes are gay.

It is not illegal for people to refuse to buy from niggers, so it shouldn't be illegal for people to refuse to sell to niggers.

You can prioritise the consumers or you can prioritise the producers, because it's easier for the producers to mess up the consumers than the other way around, it's more libertarian to prioriritise the consumers.

Therefore. No. You should not be able to refuse service under normal, average regular circumstances.

Commie scum.

"It's libertarian to restrict people's freedoms."

The only valid human rights are property rights.

Ancaps are basically as bad as communists. Changing the all powerful monopoly in life from a dictatorial government to a dictatorial corporation doesn't change much. Both will abuse people if unchecked.

Today I learned, it's communism to advertise a service then punitively deny it specifically to certain groups. Totally not a breach of contract in any way.

"If you tell people you have a product, you must provide it to everyone."

I heard a good argument about that topic on one of Ben Shapiro's sunday specials. Idk which, but it was something like "You shouldn't be allowed to deny service to someone buying anything in stock, but you can deny service if that service is custom in that it will require you to make something specific for the purchase"

So a gay dude can buy a stock cake from a baker, but not ask for a cake with 2 dicks crossing streams

Why is that a good argument?

Oh so you're a bake the cake kind of guy

You're not very good at inferring my position from a question.

Which is fine, because I'm not sure that's a skill people can actually possess.

What makes offering a service to do custom jobs different from offering standard products?

If you are offering a service to people saying "describe a cake and ill bake it for you" how is that different from offering to bake 3 different flavors of cake at request?

Cause the custom service requires that the seller is having "expression forced into their mouth" cause they have to create something specific that may have a message that they don't agree with, where selling things in stock is a vendor like action where you have no input in the product except for the financial transaction itself.

So you can be forced to work, but not to speak.

I'm not articulating this as well as I heard, it. I wish I could find which Sunday Special it was.

Maybe an example would help me get my point across. I can sell anyone a blue cake, but I don't want to be forced to sell someone a cake that has my face on it that says "This guy is an evil Nazi" if they ask for something like that.

So the producer has the final say in what they make

You're basically advocating to force people to do business, to perform an economic transaction, when they don't want to.