Supposed to be from a female in the FN group

But guys, said narrative in your premiseb wasn't originated by the guy who, was just represented as having "claimed to be attacked "

And his first talks to the media supported the meme.

The FNG was minding it's own buisnese when the students surrounded them.

Alright well that's more details, the female, but dudes If there is measursnke destruction in the discourse by false false conclusions, you gotta commit to a mantra to try and not be subject to making false conclusions

ahh, can you redo that with voice to text?

And a supposed female in the group group being the supposed evidence of bad faith, is poor discovery

Being female? no. But there's pretty clear factions in this story. And we should expect people will be trying to steer the narrative according to their faction.

I am not trying to be a dick but I don't understand what you put in.

I got to go, IRL stuff.

night Pratel

No, the reach to conclude that this meme point that was made, and is being sold as a confirmed attribution to this female FN member, so as to establish certainty in their motives, but isnt by any means confirmed

Is bad judgement

Ok. The source of the meme is to me unknown. However it was sent out by someone who had access to video taken onsite. That means someone who was party to the events, faction unknown. That was the first thing.

Intial statements made by members of the FNG support the meme but correct it so that the short video clips can be used.

Do you have a link to those , I'm trying to establish they're initial state.ents

https://www.snopes.com/ap/2019/01/19/students-in-maga-hats-mock-native-american-after-rally/

good night

Sorry had company. Is there any links to initial claims by the native march attendees, that the youth group had made the approach, and not the nathan Phillip's guy walking up to them?

why is it that the only source so many news outlets use is AP? CBC/BBC/CNN/Snopes they all use the single interviews done by AP instead of sending their own reporters out. Have News outlets become that lazy?

yes

and they suffer for it

It's been this way for a long time. People assume the different news sources are different. In truth, they usually republish the AP. This often includes Fox News.

Look for AP attributions and bizarrely similar language and details across news companies. Once you see it, it becomes uncanny.

I've joked for some time about lefties who will reject an AP article if it's reprinted by Breitbart.

we have a means

Yo, opinions, is this freshie "stateless socialist" brave for actually attending and asking questions at a right wing event? https://youtu.be/Y9O-NoccXQQ

brave ?

umm socialism is everyone owns the labor of everyone

lol

Equal access to everyone is equal amounts of enslavement.

yeah, because whoever coordinates that equalization is the one with actual power

communism makes it the government

and that's USUALLY what happens in socialism

https://medium.com/@AspieSavant/16-basis-principles-of-mass-indoctrination-8ee8b179cf4a

The voting thing is false though.

Also, the picture for 14 has things somewhat reversed

somewhat false. The reason why Trump got in is because the republicans got complacent, expecting RINOs vs Neolibs to go on forever. Pretty much everyone expected the public to reject him. By the time the republicans considered Bern'ing him it would have been suicidal to do so

Alternatively, everyone in the political world knew about Clinton's dirt and expected campaigners to sabotage her through over confidence, if so it never actually mattered who the Republican candidate was so they might as well have had some fun with Trump

That's why I didn't vote in the 2016 election. I probably would have voted for Bernie if he had won the nomination, but at the time I knew too much about Clinton to want to vote for her, and I had bought in to enough of the anti-Trump narrative that I didn't want to vote for him either.

the right had no way of berning him, the republicans have been in a state of fragmentation since the end of the bush administration, they arnt a united order with supreme power of political manipulation the same way the dnc was, bernie WAS very populer as a canadate against hillery at all points during his campaign as trump was on the republican side, but the republican side, they were both consitered outsiders by their respective partys, the big difference was the solidarity to focus the most onto a single canadate that the dnc had which the republicans did not have, not to mention the republicans kinda wanted to win so as the underdog they went with what was the best chance where the dnc went with what was most safe for them