And they are kinda quiet

Yeah though it can be cheaper and save personnel

I just think bombers are downplayed in effectiveness

Yeah I mean you want something that's harder to hit is usually the case if they have anti-aircraft weapons however

I’ve easily crippled Brazil using bombers and two carriers

GG @Stryker_Initius, you just advanced to level 2!

i think they're overkill for a ragtag group like isis

I’m talking about invasion of countries

High altitude bombers are great to avoid that problem

yeah but you have to guard your bombers too

(My crippling of Brazil refers to a game I’ve played)

you have to worry about SAMs

what game?

Basically hearts of iron four

But if your opponent makes no anti air

You just cruise in there

hearts of iron 4 if you know what you're doing you can conquer the world with luxembourg

Mhm

not exactly a simulation i'd rely on

Look

True

But still you do it

Then you think about it

If you were able to map out a countries most economic cities

Or most valuable cities to an economy

If the Geneva convention didn’t exist

You just slide some bombers in there and cripple their economy

Effective, yes. Ethical, no

Then again if you are hell-bent on domination and conquest you wouldn't worry about "rules of war" because it would only hinder you

Yeah

I’ve also thought about that

What if America invaded South America and Mexico

It’s complicated

Because eventually countries would realize what america is doing

Form an alliance against them to defend themselves

It wouldn't be straight up ground war because it wouldn't be as effective against certain countries so it would need to be done a certain way

Other countries in Europe, Asia or Africa see this and either cancel trade with America

Also if that happened I expect a Canadian American alliance

Mhm

They have lots of raw material

Oil, metals and other stuff that's valuable up there