Message from @pukeblood
Discord ID: 407300632064688128
It wasn't that he was gay
Yeah, she even said it was because of a higher risk of STD's, I know.
I wouldn't call disagreing with someone's lifestyle, hate.., though
I forgot to mention that, sorry. lol
it's jsut a disagreement..
It was the risk of getting STDs since the actor wasn't required to take a test before that specific shoot
Yeah, I don't understand this obsession with emotion. Even if they did "hate" gays, what does it matter?
She had already done shoots with other bisexual men IIRC
@JadenFrostwolf just because that's her job, she shouldn't be forced to have sex with them, regardless of the reason
And yeah I don't care what someone's reason is for not having sex
They have the choice regardless of how stupid the reason os
it's their body.. regardless of prfession
I know, I'm on the side of the actress.
oh I know you are, I was agreeing with you
Even more is on the line since it's going online for everyone to see
and even if I didn't agree with you
that wouldn't mean I hated you 😄
Yeah. lol
because you know, I'm able to separate hate from disagreement
Ur all stupid and ignorant for not agreeing with me
JUST LOOK AT THE SCIENCE YOU IDIOTS
taylor swift gets bullied for not openly stating her political values, and thats WEIRD as shit to me
I know. lol
are you saying she gets hated on for NOT HAVING AN OPINION
lol
When people pull the science card it pisses me off
science changes every 5 years as we get new data..
Everyone on every side of the spectrum does it
Science isn't an entity
so while, yeah, science can be used, my god, it's not set in stone
@LotheronPrime Science changes every second as we get new data
exactly
We form theorems which contain a set of statements that back each other up inside of such theorem
@Christopher Yactayo So you're saying science is like wikipedia?
science =/= statistics though
too many people are quick to find a cause for ANY statistic, good or bad
They aren't always true in the sense of reality we just choose the theories that best match observations
its like the pseudoscientific health articles "eggs are bad for you mmkay"
because some people reacted bad to eggs
For example, special relativity vs traditional Newtonian physics
Techinically science is like wikipedia. Anyone can make a scientific study or display new data. Then that data is tested and retested to assure whether it is true or not. So yes, like wikipedia
Special relativity superseded Newtonian physics completely, giving a completely new set of supporting assertions and observations