Message from @Ghostler
Discord ID: 426896300861030411
something not concealable.
In large cities; not everywher
gotta love the police chief. His officers do jack shit, then he blames guns for his failure
Because it seems to just be the cities that are plagued with this.
Because criminals are so keen on respecting laws, right?
Police chief wiggum
Oh; I'm not saying it'll be easy or that you'll get all of them or even most of them
then, not too long later, a different school with a different resource officer proves that it was his officer's fault without a doubt by stopping a school shooter
eeyup. <:eeyup:327220779576066049>
I just think that'd be an actual step forward in terms of cutting down the hundreds of inner city handgun deaths
Which doesn't get *nearly* the coverage that the Florida shooting does.
Because it doesn't fit the left's narrative.
It still sucks; IMO they should just arm everyone in the inner city.
Welcome to chicago, here's your high point and your CCW card
have 100 rounds on me.
Have a good day.
just like the texas church shooting didn't get much coverage
Even with a completely armed population I bet it'd take years for the gang violence to actually die down.
those good guys with guns stopping gun crime is not good for the narrative
Not without resorting to authortarian tactics, which I'm not entirely against when it comes to criminal organizations.
Problem is; you'd need to identify who's what
Which isn't really fair.
what is the difference between authoritarian government and criminal organizations?
In a lot of cases, they do know who these gang members are.
Because they've been in and out of the system so many times.
Certainly
the criminal organizations have less human rights violations
but if they served their times, in all fairness, they should have a chance
Except it's just not that simple with the US court system.
I was actually somewhat OK with clinton's three strikes as far as it went to violent crime
the drug crime I am totally against
they should have a chance. too often are they in and out of the system all the time because the system more less works to keep them in there
yeah; I am aware
I'm just not going to draw a black line because 80% of offenders offend again
GROSSLY OFFENSIVE
The three strikes laws did sometimes result in “bad outcomes”, such as where the 3rd conviction was for some minor crime. That said, in some circumstances today it swings the other way. In some jurisdictions (your sanctuary city regions) you have prosecutors that are intentionally undercharging on some serious/violent crimes because if the perp’s crime is more serious than x/results in jail time longer than 365 days, then it constitutes a felony which means (illegal alien) perp will be eligible for deportation. So people who did commit a serious crime are being undercharged to keep them off ICE’s radar.
There is a reason they are eligible for deportation
Ffs
"let's prove illegals are good people by not getting rid of the murders"
Yeah, which is something I often see certain leftists overlooking when they go on about "look at all of the people in jail just over drug charges, it's ridiculous!" While I agree in cases where that's really what was going on, often these people have committed more serious crimes, but plea bargained down to drug charges for the sake of revealing information or speed. How many of these 'people in jail over drug charges' were the result of plea bargains?