I said allow you to buy pass the existing laws in other states.

people that commit crimes with guns will do so because they're already breaking the law. They wont have a license, they still will have a gun, and they still will commit crimes

must I point out crime in NY vs London this year

Because cry unconditional all you want, you'll still end up in jail if caught as it is.

Depending on the state

Only Hawaii and the District of Columbia require the registration of all firearms.

The state of New York requires the registration of handguns.

People who will commit crime already do NOT follow law.. why make more laws they wont follow just to make it hard on the rest of the law abiding public

Like I said, I don't believe in all or nothing. Not only does it not make you any better that the other side, being unwilling to compromise, it also doesn't get you any closer to your goal unless you get an overwhelming majority.

California and Maryland require new residents to report their firearms.

The "other side"'s goal is complete disarmament of the populace

no thanks

they get nothing

Good for you. You get no where.

I don't need to get anywhere

I have the right to bear arms

no one can say different.

Unless the constitution is changed, which wont be

this really is a pointless argument. for all.

Fine, let the other side win

"shall not be infringed"

the other side will not win

California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, New Jersey, and a New York all I have some kind of registration required for so-called "assault weapons" and/or "assault pistols" and/or 50 caliber or larger weapons and/or high-capacity magazines.

They will if they get enough people.

meh, it'll never happen

Hell, they are starting to get private businesses on their side

I don't live in any of the aforementioned States, nor the District of Columbia, nor do I have any intention of ever living in any of those States or the District of Columbia.

why should anyone have to comprise on their rights? I mean, what's the point? How will me compromising on my rights stop crazy people from doing crazy things?

You see, there becomes a problem when you refuse to compromise even a little to shift the existing stuff in your favor. There already is gun control laws. There is a federal ban on actually assault rifles, which is to say fully automatic ones. So say what you want about it never happening. I say it already has happened and could get worse if you try and win people over.

In fact, the only States on that list I have ever even been to are Maryland and California. I will have to travel through California, maybe, when I move back where I'm going to move back to, but I don't think transporting my weapons through the state will have any kind of registration requirements. And frankly, I'll probably go the more Northern route, so I don't have to go through California. But that depends on the time of year, as well.

that doesn't make any of those constitutional in the intent of the founding fathers of the 2A

regardless of the fact that they exist

The fact they exist is why I say you lost

https://i.redd.it/k4vx26v89uu01.jpg

Actually, there is no federal ban on assault rifles. The sale and transfer of them is strictly regulated, but you can buy them. You can't buy a new one anymore, not since 1987? 1986? I forget, but anyway, you can still buy used ones, but doing so is strictly regulated. Not banned.

Because if they are unconstitutional, how are they still on the books, and being enforced

yup

because they have to be challenged in the courts to be unconstitutional

Well, in order for a law to be judged unconstitutional, it has to be fought in court and make it to the Supreme Court.

They have been, and they usually don't win

Otherwise they wouldn't still be on the books.