But I don't debate

I'm just here for the fun of it

that is a base biological drive taken to its extreme, like the flood or Borg from fiction

Expansion for the sake of expansion

It's not for it's own sake.

It's for Power and what you Can Do with it.

There would be power struggles for that kind of position, people aren't automatons to lord over in such a blatant way

Italy is small and it needs more land.

if she wants to be an Autarchy

Changing the culture to make it almost impossible to assimilate without the use of force is the first step.

Hey if a 9 year old murders someone do they go to juve or a mental health clinic?

Italy isn't an autarchy though

Thanks for the answer

@Deleted User If he is sane and understands enough what he did, neutralization.

I'm asking this because one thinks he can go to prison

Which I doubt

If it suffers of anti-social personality Disorder, neutralization.

No 9 year old goes to prison

Atleast I think they don't

Age is not important when it comes to law.

If you are that deviant you get neutralized.

ur mixing ideology with reality

Italy is too small to allow a great, further demographic expansion.

A silent and long takeover of other people's land is necessary for expansion.

I am discussing how the state should be and deal with certain issues.

How the state should work and what should the people do

if ur a powerful statesman like that, u could just improve ur own situation first, i population is a problem, the first thing to do is implement social barriers to having children. The lower IQ part of the population would be eliminated from participating by circumstance. This is actually how Europe worked, not by state policy, but from social norms, the barrier to marriage was much higher.

I know that.

Also

I didn't say that the expansion would be immediate.

First we Need to also limit emigration for a while.

We need to reform culturally.

It's quite ignorant of historical relations, Italy would be blacklisted when they found out, alliances would be broken. It flies in the face of any sense of European brotherhood that could exist.

I dislike other Europeans as much as everybody else.

It would necessarily bring about a world war, regardless of whether you like Europeans or not

The culture must lead to forms of demographic expansion and it must Be spontaneous.

It would not Be too blatantly obvious.

Also, there are several forms of demographic warfare, some of which are more subtle.

The main two types are the Symbiotic and Parasitic forms.

•Symbiotic Demographic Warfare (SDW), where the DC benefit the HC, without integrating (And therefore maintaining their national and ethnic identity).

SDW is especially effective with modern, secular and liberal democracies as it is less obvious and it's less unlikely that ethnic tension will be present between the DCs and the natives of the HC.

It also works best if an extensive welfare state is implemented, as it will increase the dependence on the DC of the HC.

The main problem of SDW is that increases the strenght and resources of the HC, which might make a counter-attack, if the plan is discovered.

•Parasitic Demographic Warfare (PDW), where the DC drain the HC economy and resources.

Useful to damage the economy of the HC, especially if the HC has a large welfare state and is non-discriminatory.

The PDW's problem is that it's much more obvious and that ethnic tension between the natives and the DC is almost assured.

It can be especially good for poor countries, as the harmful immigration of the DC can be justified as an humanitarian crysis.

HC = Host Country