Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 543695764124336140


2019-02-09 07:13:49 UTC  

actually the liberals are on the left

2019-02-09 07:13:49 UTC  

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 20!

2019-02-09 07:13:54 UTC  

not right

2019-02-09 07:15:58 UTC  

Are libertarians not Liberals?

2019-02-09 07:16:04 UTC  

This lad😂

2019-02-09 07:16:07 UTC  

there not they are libtards

2019-02-09 07:16:12 UTC  

Yes, but no

2019-02-09 07:16:19 UTC  

The left adopted "Liberal"

2019-02-09 07:16:23 UTC  

Made it into their own

2019-02-09 07:16:58 UTC  

-however thats knowledge I gained from PragerU

2019-02-09 07:17:23 UTC  

So, I might need to do some more research concerning that topic

2019-02-09 07:17:40 UTC  

Considering some people might not view PragerU as a viable source.

2019-02-09 07:17:49 UTC  

Im in economics class so the teacher told me that liberals are on the left

2019-02-09 07:18:53 UTC  

and I would rather listen to my teacher than the internet

2019-02-09 07:19:06 UTC  

Conservatives are still generally cucked. They do not even have much of an interest in even conserving their own culture and national identity and they are okay with people behaving like animals in their country so long as they don't cause to much trouble with everyone else.

2019-02-09 07:19:17 UTC  

That's the colloquial modern use of liberal. The libertarian movement came out of the enlightenment and for short they were referred to as liberals.

2019-02-09 07:27:11 UTC  

Conservatives have always been weak willed and milquetoast. If you've ever read Benito Mussolini's memoirs, he said in 1943 after the conservatives along with the scumbag king screwed him over and supported the allies, forcing Mussolini into exile. He said that now realising true fascism was now possible, since the self-removal of the conservatives purified the party. Remember, the four founding factions of the Italian Fascist party were Socialists, syndicalists, and nationalists, along with of course the Black shirts. There were no conservatives or capitalists percent. It was these corrosive forces that undermined the party and they only assimilated into said party not because they believe in forming a united front, no but because they put heir own personal safety and freedom above all else. Since capitalism is the epitome of selfishness.

2019-02-09 07:28:23 UTC  

@Deleted User Your boomer economics teacher better stick to educating a future generation of Corporate cucks.

2019-02-09 07:30:23 UTC  

boomer? you know I live in california home to socialists and democrats and Like I said I would rather listen to her than you or the internet you uneducated facist

2019-02-09 07:32:14 UTC  

you want me to explain facism right now?

2019-02-09 07:32:51 UTC  

Her job is to teach you about the economy, not necessarily politics. Please trace the world liberal back toward its source and tell me what you find.

2019-02-09 07:33:02 UTC  

If you feel comfortable, go ahead.

2019-02-09 07:34:42 UTC  

If you're that willing to subject yourself to the whims of established authority, I'm surprised that you aren't an authoritarian.

2019-02-09 07:35:08 UTC  

Fascism is fully controlled, state corporatism and means what ever the hell the leader wants it to mean. **to my understanding

2019-02-09 07:35:33 UTC  

National socialism is different to fascism, but only slightly

2019-02-09 07:36:10 UTC  

Facism:

- It glorifies the nation and insists that citizens should put the state abover their individuality.
- Nation is a unit of society and race.
- Came from nationalism
- state controls economy
- Suppress political freedom and freedom of speech
- totalitarian leadership

2019-02-09 07:36:29 UTC  

@steel inquisitor The leader is not different to the people. Under fascism, all property of the state is one entity.

2019-02-09 07:40:33 UTC  

also my bad not economics teacher but my history teacher

2019-02-09 07:41:09 UTC  

but in my economics teacher im learning socialism and capitalism

2019-02-09 07:41:30 UTC  

and economics is a type of politics

2019-02-09 07:41:48 UTC  

it deals with the countries economy

2019-02-09 07:43:50 UTC  

big paragraph?

2019-02-09 07:44:08 UTC  

National socialism has a heavier emphasis on looking after and fighting for the people of your nation compared to fascism. Natsoc to my understanding is controlled capitalism for the benefit of your people and your nation. The state is dedicated and fighting for them and for the nation.

Fascism however is controlled corporatism for the benefit of the state.

2019-02-09 07:44:24 UTC  

Yo y’all tryna hop in a vc and talk about this?

2019-02-09 07:44:29 UTC  

And the elite

2019-02-09 07:44:57 UTC  

Imma listen to this debate in VC.

2019-02-09 07:45:36 UTC  

General news vc?

2019-02-09 07:45:45 UTC  

I don't know much about Facism, all I know is that the Italians under the rule hated their leader and strung them up in the street after the war ended

2019-02-09 07:46:28 UTC  

Bois join vc to debate further

2019-02-09 07:47:04 UTC  

Fascists are actually quite lenient on the racial aspect of society, they're more willing to accept a broader racial conglomerate, like Northern Italians and Scallions. Unlike under national socialism, where race and the internal realm are the foundation of life. Fascist racial policy is down stream from National Socialist racial policy.

Fascism is a form of nationalism, third positionism in general is the logical conclusion of Nationalism.

Well states and corporations form syndicates and synthesise production for the benefit of all parties. Companies aren't a separate entity under fascism.

Suppression of treason and degeneracy is justified, since you don't want your population to be poisoning themselves.

Eh, you could call it totalitarian, but most fascist governments use executive power from a group of six leaders, coupled with in party bureaucracy. However, totalitarianism is Hitler's term and should only be accurately used when addressing the NSDAP or any other Natsoc parties.

2019-02-09 07:47:50 UTC  

Fuck Fascism. Change my mind @Deleted User