i mean

you gotta be a baby to have nightmares over a video

i watched it and it wasnt even that graphic

@The Lemon If you are that retarded to the point that where you can’t understand that I was lampooning him and libertarianism, kill yourself. Regardless, so what? Go on live leak and in seconds you can find stuff that’s more gruesome, the video would be tame by comparison. Ultimately though, Violence is necessary. A human being cannot go through life without causing some sort of violence, weather that violence is directed towards humans or other life forms is irrelevant. However, the acts of violence we perpetrate are more subtle. For example, when you vote for a candidate and a platform your vote is your force pushing for that person to have the tools to carry out an agenda. That agenda may hurt another person, maybe not physically but financially or emotionally. The consequence of you using political force upon someone is an unconventional violent action. And when you know that an outside group had been purposely inflicting socio-physiological, financial, physical, spiritual, and racial degradation. Perhaps, an accelerator blatantly violent action is in order to reestablish order.

@Deleted User Most pride rallies are more graphic.

ive seen videos more graphic than that video

It wasn't even the fact that video wasn't graphic

It was the fact that he killed 20~30 people in literally less than 3 minutes

And shot a woman begging for her life in the skull

I never even realized those weapons were that powerful

It's almost like they were designed to kill people as efficiently as possible

He used an ar right

And the 5.56 round is made to wound not kill

So they were not designed to kill as efficiently as possible

it was most likely the civilian variant of the AR so yeah

Yea

My point is guns are designed to kill, you shouldn't be surprised when they do so

Well, yeah, no shit, but hearing and seeing it are two different things all together

But this gun is literally designed to wound and stop not kill

If he used an ak then it would be right

Well it killed 20-30 people in 3 mins and that's the fact of the matter

Yea it’s a dangerous gun

Gun design or type doesn't matter

Unless it's some Kolibri or the FP-45 which both either were small to the point of uselessness or just for one time use.

Well, I'll just leave my piece here.
Guns do not act on their own, and do not kill unless in the hands of someone with intent to do so.

*I know, this is basic stuff, but I just wanted to place this here.*

actually they have invented some pretty cool automated guns

Don’t most of em have to be controlled by humans

not all of them

in fact most of them once set up use sensors to detect targets

no human required

i was just explaining that to braden

so you can't necessarily use that argument

however

most standard a.i. autonomous guns are controlled by humans sentry's the type i'm talking about are not

oh yeah these

Lethal autonomous weapons are a type of autonomous military robot that can independently search

Gangweed gamers rise up

Bruh, we don't need sentry bots this early in the 2000s.

Maybe during the 2030s and after.

Sentrys are used like in the movie alien