Message from @Techpriest
Discord ID: 567216626399838208
They collect more taxes for the U.S. Government than the U.S. Government actually pays them back
You expect those high crusts in LA to ration water? Lol. But in all seriousness, even if a state does have the means, which only a few do, they do not have the desire, and wider financial independence / greater states rights would not change this.
which is why normally one state wouldn't secede
but a vast amount would
except Texas
they always seem to hold a random reefrendum
on whether they should secede
but the result is always 30% yes but 60% no
But most states don't have the desire, and financial independence / greater states rights would not change this, is my point
think of it as this
what if trump suddenly said
FUCK ILLEGALS
we will kill all of the illegals
right now
Why would a group of states, in today's world, want to succeed, in order to form another union
California has already sanctuary cities in ensuring the federal government have no jurisdictions over these undocumented people.
California just needs enough sanctuary cities to get the state involved into becoming a sanctuary state.
I don't even know how to respond to that since it's not remotely realistic tbh
States only secede when there is a conflict of interest
and Jackson literally btfo them out
Confederacy tried to secede to protest muh slavery
and Lincoln btfo them out
So whenever a state is going to secede
it's going to be some greater conflict of interest
Right, I agree. A state would not secede unless there was some great conflict
But a state would have to "assume" it is financially independent
to even secede in the first place
It's not like the other southern states wanted to secede like South Carolina did during Jackson's era.
But they werent' financially sound enough to do so like they thought
Some were just being admitted into the union
So if a state should ever try to secede
look to the states that are trying to be financially independent first
don't alienate them
Also for your link on united states treaties
after 1945, i haven't seen a ratification
I've seen Presidents signing them, Presidents agreeing them, Presidents abiding by them, but no Senate ratifying them. It's all about the executive agreements.
That's how even the War Powers Act was proposed and passed
because the Presidents were trying to sign agreements that weren't "legally-binding" like a treaty is.