Message from @Techpriest
Discord ID: 572958175016255525
ok
Grab everybody who wants to be leader
Randomly takes them out
Into 2 separate group
Then take 10 out of the 2 group and put it into a group of 20
Then divide that group into 2 groups of 5
Play some 50-50 chance of some object leaning to the sky or the ground
Then one group of 5 gets elimianted
and there u go
now you have 1 vote for one of the 5 people
That's how the Thebes did their government and it worked out
If you were destined to rule, the gods will will it into the randominess
Overall you don't need a pure blood kingship
What you need is one leader who rules for the common interest of his or her people
One that is indisputable based and redpilled
yes
tbh i dont know much about the whole theory of monarchies
The whole theory of monarch is based on 3 school of philosophy
1 is that if you want the most stable government, you choose a pre-existing monarch and keep the status quo. Might makes right at its origin. The will to power.
2 is what I've recently discussed in the mandate of heaven where if your governorship was essentially good and prosperous for the nation, you were destined to rule. Otherwise the inability to handle natural disaster and shit planning means you have lost the destiny to rule.
but in fact serves to be the figurehead of the nation and commander of the army
The third philosophy has been more prevalent as the monarchy has been more of a popular figure rather than a dictating figure.
most stable or only stable
since all these governments are just puppet states
nothing has much changed
not at all
1) What is stable about squabbles for the crown which lead to deaths and destruction within the country which you are supposed to work for.
2) Mandate of heaven is complete bullshit with no evidence to show that is even a decent way of determining ruler. That would be the same thing as saying if lightning strikes you, you deserve to die.
3) If the monarch does nothing but as a figure head you need a mascot not a royal twat, it's not at any point necessary to have them.
The English Civil War was kinda pointless
Replaced one annoying twat with another
And then replacing him with the son of the first annoying twat
Because we thought the son of the second annoying twat was also a twat