Message from @LotheronPrime
Discord ID: 449606330102317058
etc
so, you propose the media can report on the findings, then, because you can't keep a jury that isolated for a year, let off everyone in the September trail because there is no unbiased jury?
that would be speech suppression by the goverment.. basically
or do we detain the jury all year
no, i would not fucking have a trial so far out if the information leaking could affect the outcome
well true
but some fuckwad made that choice (or maybe they are too busy putting people on trail for hate speech to do it any sooner), so now what?
This is basically victim blaming
btw
i....wut
oh you're the victim of knowledge and you shared it, you goto jail
because we can't be sensible in our court proceedings
not victim of knowledge, but you get what I'm saying
are you a leftist?
anyway, I think it's BS in either case
"you did an action, but you are the victim"
haha no
>you shared it
that is an action
it would be victim blaming if you jailed the jury for hearing it
an action I don't deem illegal...
i.e. reporting on the trial, possbily the verdict.. that wouldn't be illegal here, regardless
hence why the jury is usually instructed to not watch the media
so you can't arrest media for that, and TR is media in this case.. so our first amendment should protect what he was doing
well in this case, not watch the media (for a year), talk to family (for a year), talk to colleagues (for a year). Since we are here, because some fuckwad (the person who should really be sent to jail) split this up across a year. What are the options?
also, this is in the UK
not supressing the media is not an option
again I know this
I'm talking about what would happen here and why I think it's wrong
i agree, this shit really wouldn't fly here
and also, that happens all the time in jury trials, jury sequesters
265 days for the OJ trial.
so there's your answer of what happens here
which one, his first or second?
first
the murder trial
I shouldn't say 265 days is the norm, but it has happened, and that's how it was dealt with, rightly or wrongly
What happens if someone on a jury breaks that? they kicked off the jury
?
yup