Its about ensuring the preservance of our future. So of course women AND men will be involved.

to give stormcels access to a white waifu, but they aren't going to just stick around, it's the same mistake the liberals make when they assume peolpe are just going to sit still and accept paying whatever tax rate etc

Yea but you understand peolpe are going to disagree right?

Because as I said, there will be men disagreeing with this. There will be both men AND women disagreeing with anti free media policies, tough pro racial policies etc

Yes

What im saying is the very creatures you are trying to keep in, are probably the most likely to want to run

that's going to have huge geopolitical consequences

I'm not negating that

As i said, they might try, but probably won't succeed

This state will be the odd ball, like North Korea, it won't have many highly educated people which means advanced weapons will be limited, sanctions out the ass, and more than likely all manner of covert action to get women out across the border into Free territory like oh...Delaware and Pennsylvania

Why won't it have many highly educated people?

men around the world would fight this place for free to have a shot at being a hero

Most of them won't have this view

No they wouldn't lol. you are very idealistic and optimistic, your perception of human nature is what you wish humans acted like
But humans just do not give a shit about ethics, you will not have a civil war with 50 percent of people marching down the street with rifles ready to fight the state. that spirit is LONG gone

IF they get ensured a steady well benefiting job, they will take itt

I'm thinking more of the dark side, people that are blood thristy waiting for a legitimate enemy

this is like a dream come true for them, fighting a regime that oppress poor white women just trying to vote

They think they are. But really they are not. If they have seen 20 percent of what the fighters in the american civil war had seen, they would take literally ANYTHING except that

"Your side" would be the side facing that, almost on the same territory, but now with PGMs and all manner of new nasty tricks

Fallujah USA

There would be insurgencies in places like Asheville, which is a great area for one, which is why my doomstead is out there, etc

We wouldn't. When talking about repealing the 19th, a totalitarian authoritarian regime is presupposed. The army has drones, tanks, helicopters, fighting jets, nukes etc
If there was a civil war, (but thats a big IF, because people think they are ready, but actually are not), you would not have a CHANCE against someone who was trained for a whole straight year to kill, and not give a shit about killing, to know to analyze the environment around him, to find best hiding spots, good reaction time etc
People wouldn't have a chance

Which peolpe though you'd have combat vets on both sides, and presumably, the 'other side' woudl have way more numbers

I'm a marine vet, 8 years, I don't think anybody i knew would fight on 'your side' in this situation

certainly not the female marines lol

More numbers? You don't understand what I'm saying. If we are talking about repealing the 19th amendment, we are talking about a high portion of the country already supporting authoritarianism/totalitarianism
Because, how else could an openly proud fascist get to power, if majority of the people didn't support him?

I follow the alt-right drama. The race war thing would be way easier to sell than the race war+ gender war thing

which is why we saw all that static with some of the alt right ladies and the stormcels like 2 years ago

Nah you missed my point

There wouldn't be a repeal, it would require secession

Only way to get that goal is if you had secession, ther eis no way current USA is going to repeal 19th

Majority of VOTERS didnt' support trump, electoral college win, and even then, he's only a slightly more dramatic standard issue US politician

Currently no, however after the tensions rise when Trump gets impeached/loses, people will grow angry, and would want something more radical than trump. Which will resort to either a even stronger conservative, or a reactionary traditionalist

They certainly don't support him now, either

Nah, trump's main function is to be a lightning rod for tons of hate that his followers will catch. setting them up to be the baddies in the next big dust up

He's not even a conservative by any stretch of the imagination

especially with this shit going on with the Kurds in turkey, I have friends crying abotu it because they served along side the kurds

I know, but that's not what matters. people THINK he is a conservative. People view him as a conservative, but presuming they grow more angry, they will want someone more radical

DOes anybody really think though? i dunno man

I don't think people think he's a conservative, I just think they wanted somebody anti-establishment(at the beginning)

everybody could see he didn't have traditional family values, life long democrat from NYC, no military service yada yad