It's not a theory it's actual history, the thing is that he just makes some assumptions or the acts makes it seem as he has negetive view towards it

Why not teach the good things religion has done

He never really teached us how religions shaoed civiliasation

He just teached the bad things

Well

aboout it

all of history can be described as this: A collection of ideas and perspectives dominated by the victors

Pre-modern era history is kinda gay

Like ofc religion has done good and bad things

Isis

Well, if you look at the history book that we had, 90% is european history

And it was labeled as world history

Because european history is the most significant, the world is dominated by europe

fair enough to me

it's not about representation

Australian/Indian history is not as significant or influencing as European

Europe lost there Dominance a long time ago

Yea

It did

Yea, but it's not really world history if you don't explore the history outside European influence

LOL

Europe dominated the world

GG @ayayron, you just advanced to level 13!

USA Russia and China are the big dogs

It's jus Europeaan hisory

Asian history isn't as significant to the world

as european

if you discover the shaping of the world we know today

Indeed @Deleted User

Of course Europe shaped the world, but there a lot more rich history to be leraned in the Middle east, africa, asia south america

🆙 | **Alexandria leveled up!**

?

What rich history

Well, mohhamad

I'd prefer to learn about significance such as the romans

the aztecs

rather than muhammad allah akbar

the aztecs were literally a useless tribe

that sacrificed their own people and did nothing that impact today

muhammad allah akbar conquered some shit

in the name of islam