I'll link it

> China has pledged to boost US imports by $200bn above 2017 levels and strengthen intellectual property rules.

> China has committed to increasing its US imports by at least $200bn over 2017 levels, boosting purchases of agriculture by $32bn, manufacturing by $78bn, energy by $52bn and services by $38bn.

> China has agreed to take more action against counterfeiting and make it easier for companies to pursue legal action over trade secret theft

> The US will maintain up to 25% tariffs on an estimated $360bn worth of Chinese goods; China, which has levied new tariffs on $100bn worth of US products, is also expected to maintain the majority of them

@✨Skolander✨

China is also removing barriers to entry for US companies to enter the Chinese market in finance, banking. China also will stop the force technology transfer.

And this is all **phase 1**.

And now where's the downside? the jobs lost?

Jobs lost from..... increasing exports?

oh, the one-sided analysis from whatever biased source didn't cover that?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51114425

You mean this?

What a surprise, it's all good of course.

lul, bbc.

I didn't realise BBC was biased in right wing and to Trump?

Shocker that is.

I don't give a shit about the BBC

> oh, the one-sided analysis from whatever biased source didn't cover that?

Didn't you call it biased a second ago?

I can repeat that it's biased again if you'd like

Bias towards right wing?

biased towards fiction.

I don't care about narratives

These are the trade deal provisions.

Reminder this is only phase 1, phase 2 is yet to come.

lul why do I even bother.

BBC being a right wing bias according to you is a hilarious hot take, but it's not worse than this:
> > Going to the brink of war with NK and Iran
> Randomly assassinating the second most powerful man in their country.

Reminder we killed a terrorist and they couldn't do anything about it.

Under Obama we had sailors arrested by Iran and drone's shot down.

funny, 3 times now you mentioning something having a right wing anything when I don't give a shit about narratives.

Also, nice whataboutism

It isn't whataboutism, it's an example to the previous admin. Now we have a strong admin who takes Iran to the wall

> 3 times now you mentioning something having a right wing anything when I don't give a shit about narratives.
You called the BBC bias, I assume it's to the right wing(lol).

I told you what kind of bias they have.

What bias?

scroll up

don't care about you.

you think I give a shit to educate you anything whatsoever?

I declared 20 minutes ago you weren't a serious person

If you can't defend your points there's a serious problem

The best you did was call something bias without anything whatsoever.

not about defending my fucking points

this shit is obvious to everyone, including you.