**They did**

This isn't "egoistic" nor is it "because of it".

They didn't, but remain in denial.

They agreed to buy 200 billion more goods than pre trade war from the US

denial.

and you wonder why people don't wanna engage.

What?

As I said, you know, I know. But you wanna pretend.

These are facts

I'll link it

> China has pledged to boost US imports by $200bn above 2017 levels and strengthen intellectual property rules.

> China has committed to increasing its US imports by at least $200bn over 2017 levels, boosting purchases of agriculture by $32bn, manufacturing by $78bn, energy by $52bn and services by $38bn.

> China has agreed to take more action against counterfeiting and make it easier for companies to pursue legal action over trade secret theft

> The US will maintain up to 25% tariffs on an estimated $360bn worth of Chinese goods; China, which has levied new tariffs on $100bn worth of US products, is also expected to maintain the majority of them

@✨Skolander✨

China is also removing barriers to entry for US companies to enter the Chinese market in finance, banking. China also will stop the force technology transfer.

And this is all **phase 1**.

And now where's the downside? the jobs lost?

Jobs lost from..... increasing exports?

oh, the one-sided analysis from whatever biased source didn't cover that?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51114425

You mean this?

What a surprise, it's all good of course.

lul, bbc.

I didn't realise BBC was biased in right wing and to Trump?

Shocker that is.

I don't give a shit about the BBC

> oh, the one-sided analysis from whatever biased source didn't cover that?

Didn't you call it biased a second ago?

I can repeat that it's biased again if you'd like

Bias towards right wing?

biased towards fiction.

I don't care about narratives

These are the trade deal provisions.

Reminder this is only phase 1, phase 2 is yet to come.

lul why do I even bother.

BBC being a right wing bias according to you is a hilarious hot take, but it's not worse than this:
> > Going to the brink of war with NK and Iran
> Randomly assassinating the second most powerful man in their country.

Reminder we killed a terrorist and they couldn't do anything about it.

Under Obama we had sailors arrested by Iran and drone's shot down.

funny, 3 times now you mentioning something having a right wing anything when I don't give a shit about narratives.

Also, nice whataboutism

It isn't whataboutism, it's an example to the previous admin. Now we have a strong admin who takes Iran to the wall

> 3 times now you mentioning something having a right wing anything when I don't give a shit about narratives.
You called the BBC bias, I assume it's to the right wing(lol).

I told you what kind of bias they have.