Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

Discord ID: 678600795289026563


2020-02-16 13:54:10 UTC  

absolute moron.

2020-02-16 13:54:16 UTC  

We didn't lose 500 billion

2020-02-16 13:54:19 UTC  

I am an economist

2020-02-16 13:54:25 UTC  

you're the one who won't even fucking read.

2020-02-16 13:54:35 UTC  

So where's this 500 billion?

2020-02-16 13:54:44 UTC  

it wasn't a real number

2020-02-16 13:54:50 UTC  

it was a guesstimate

2020-02-16 13:54:55 UTC  

I know, just like your economics degree.

2020-02-16 13:54:57 UTC  

Isn't real.

2020-02-16 13:55:10 UTC  

As I was saying, 200 billion each year increased over **pre trade war levels**

2020-02-16 13:55:11 UTC  

That's huge.

2020-02-16 13:55:17 UTC  

it wouldn't mean shit to you even if I showed you my certificate

2020-02-16 13:55:22 UTC  

Go ahead, show it.

2020-02-16 13:55:34 UTC  

go ahead, prove to me it would mean shit.

2020-02-16 13:55:41 UTC  

mr. dishonest

2020-02-16 13:55:44 UTC  

?

2020-02-16 13:55:52 UTC  

lmao you don't even understand the question.

2020-02-16 13:55:56 UTC  

hilarious.

2020-02-16 13:56:37 UTC  

Anyways, the impacts of the trade war that were negative will be compensated. $200 billion increase in exports to China over the pre trade war level is fantastic. Because this deal isn't a one time thing, in a few years the welfare gain will be greater than the loss of the trade war.

2020-02-16 13:56:44 UTC  

And a phase 2 deal coming soon will make it better.

2020-02-16 13:57:17 UTC  

The article you linked talks about how it doesn't "go far enough", however the issue is it's a phase 1 deal - not final. @✨Skolander✨

2020-02-16 13:57:42 UTC  

Besides idk why you linked that study from nber, I know the trade war hard short term ill-effects.

2020-02-16 13:57:47 UTC  

they will just magically be compensated, lul

2020-02-16 13:57:55 UTC  

Yes by seeing much higher exports.

2020-02-16 13:58:03 UTC  

But the best part is the people who were most effected, farmers - have the highest approval of Trump ever.

2020-02-16 13:58:10 UTC  

it's not that it doesn't go "far enough" that's the point, the point is you're losing money.

2020-02-16 13:58:11 UTC  

So it can't have been *that* bad.

2020-02-16 13:58:17 UTC  

We're not losing money with more exports.

2020-02-16 13:58:21 UTC  

Are you stupid? haha

2020-02-16 13:58:31 UTC  

yes you are when you import more than that

2020-02-16 13:58:39 UTC  

That's not how trade works.

2020-02-16 13:58:41 UTC  

and that 200 billion is fictional number

2020-02-16 13:58:47 UTC  

that needs to be enforced

2020-02-16 13:58:50 UTC  

We're not talking about deficits, I'm talking about how much us producers will gain.

2020-02-16 13:58:54 UTC  

Well yes, it's a trade deal.

2020-02-16 13:59:11 UTC  

you think China is just gonna net give you 200 billion?

2020-02-16 13:59:13 UTC  

moronic

2020-02-16 13:59:17 UTC  

Yes they'll buy those goods.

2020-02-16 13:59:20 UTC  

It's part of the deal.

2020-02-16 13:59:43 UTC  

Especially under Trump, boy will they feel pain if they don't.

2020-02-16 14:00:33 UTC  

they're gonna triple their energy imports over one year?