Also potentially falls victim to a shifting lowest standard

are u saying everyone is the best at somethign

cus thats wrong

in your view, yes.

and that, is the problem

i would say everyone is equally shitty

We're saying no one is worst at everything.

and we all deserve to die

what do u know about my view

ok, think about a person without legs or arms, and with an IQ of 62

You've exposed a view we're quite familiar with around here.

what is that person best at

fine, correction: in that comment's, which was written by you, world view, the answer is in its world view, yes.

now begone with you, russian bot

idk wtf ur on about

I asked "are u saying everyone is the best at somethign"

there is nothing about my world view there

well, someone without legs or arms, and an IQ of 62 is best at being them

-.-

isn't subjectivity and relativity great?

You believe the lowest specimens should be eliminated.

its that wonderful wrench that breaks everything

Is not me who believes it

It's darwin

No, it's not.

mmmm, and what is "best" was up to nature.

I dont believe in actively eleminating them

Despite all your rage Africa still exists

I believe in letting nature do its thing

according to darwin

what I dont believe in is spending valuable resources in keeping a half-dead corpse alive

we are nature

Well okay then, you're not for eugenics. that's a start

I am all for eugenics

Eugenics and letting nature take its course are mutually exclusive

as grenade said

we are nature

unless the controlling force of eugenics is nature

there is nothing that is not nature

Then it's not eugenics.

you can call it Pepe if u wish