3rd largest party https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2015/results

And they fucking hated saying that. How I giggled.

they should have gone with liberal democrats

I mean dank and sargon at least... maybe not PJW

PJW is def suited for UKIP .. but sargon and Dank could bring Lib dems back to their libertarian roots

Lib Dem is basically (or at least it was) a libertarian party standing for libertarian values

Got any links to that? They came out of the Labour party

links to what?

That they used to be Libertarians. I've spoken to my granddad about them and he never mentioned anything like that.

why do you think they are called liberal democrats?

sounds more appealing

"the Democrats" are socialists in america
"The labor party" in any country cares little for its labor people
"Peoples Republic" tends to be communist dictatorships

with sargon and dank running it, it would be libertarian

wouldnt UKIP become that too then though?

It' about optics though. They've spent years saying they arem't far right.

yeah the media wouldnt even have to call them far right anymore... just need to say - oh these guys are UKIP

and people (normal people) would just assume far-right

whereas lib dem has always been seen as lefty

centre-left

and lately heading towards far-left.. but I wouldnt say they are there yet

so the media would have to explicitly say "far-right youtubers have joined lib dems" which to normal people wouldnt make any sense at all

but wouldnt they just change the narrative?

Lib-dems no longer to be trusted since they're being co-opted by far right extremist, nazi loving my soggy knee white supremacist dogwhistlers

that just wouldnt make sense to normal people... because their policies would mostly be the same

And they already have the members with alot of cross over in UKIP

you assume normal people know their policies

well.. they would when the MSM starts talking about them

they'd know the policies the MSM claims they have

"these far-right youtubers and their policies of "pro gay marriage" and "anti-racism for anyone""

we both know they wouldnt phrase it like that

they'd lie by omission

they would be given a platform tho.. so its not like they can lie and get away with it like normal

sure they can

the last 3 years showed that

MSM can say what they want with impunity

but they'd phrase it like

it doesnt matter if they lie... in fact THATS BETTER

"These far-right members, who were at the head of former anti-women rights campaigns"

Anbd what has happened over the last 3 years? A massive drop in confidance in the MSM. Even amongst the normies.

"and anti-migrant refugee"

because they have to be given a platform.. at least on BBC ... which means they will be able to say.. thats not my beleif

over the last 3 years, the media has been telling what they want, regardless of truth, and although fortunately many (any growing) have caught on
Theres always a good portion that doesn't

yeah.. when was the last time trump was on CNN ... its not the same over here... they have to be given a platform