Message from @wacka
Discord ID: 458246189746487297
10% of the voting pop
12.6% of the 2015 votes
3rd largest party https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2015/results
And they fucking hated saying that. How I giggled.
they should have gone with liberal democrats
I mean dank and sargon at least... maybe not PJW
PJW is def suited for UKIP .. but sargon and Dank could bring Lib dems back to their libertarian roots
Lib Dem is basically (or at least it was) a libertarian party standing for libertarian values
Got any links to that? They came out of the Labour party
links to what?
That they used to be Libertarians. I've spoken to my granddad about them and he never mentioned anything like that.
why do you think they are called liberal democrats?
sounds more appealing
"the Democrats" are socialists in america
"The labor party" in any country cares little for its labor people
"Peoples Republic" tends to be communist dictatorships
with sargon and dank running it, it would be libertarian
wouldnt UKIP become that too then though?
It' about optics though. They've spent years saying they arem't far right.
yeah the media wouldnt even have to call them far right anymore... just need to say - oh these guys are UKIP
and people (normal people) would just assume far-right
whereas lib dem has always been seen as lefty
centre-left
so the media would have to explicitly say "far-right youtubers have joined lib dems" which to normal people wouldnt make any sense at all
but wouldnt they just change the narrative?
Lib-dems no longer to be trusted since they're being co-opted by far right extremist, nazi loving my soggy knee white supremacist dogwhistlers
that just wouldnt make sense to normal people... because their policies would mostly be the same
And they already have the members with alot of cross over in UKIP
you assume normal people know their policies
well.. they would when the MSM starts talking about them
they'd know the policies the MSM claims they have
"these far-right youtubers and their policies of "pro gay marriage" and "anti-racism for anyone""
we both know they wouldnt phrase it like that
they'd lie by omission
they would be given a platform tho.. so its not like they can lie and get away with it like normal
sure they can
the last 3 years showed that
MSM can say what they want with impunity
but they'd phrase it like
it doesnt matter if they lie... in fact THATS BETTER
"These far-right members, who were at the head of former anti-women rights campaigns"
Anbd what has happened over the last 3 years? A massive drop in confidance in the MSM. Even amongst the normies.
"and anti-migrant refugee"
because they have to be given a platform.. at least on BBC ... which means they will be able to say.. thats not my beleif