Message from @RyeNorth
Discord ID: 462763505985126430
Most if not all special interest groups do this same thing.
Which should also be illegal
Most laws that are presented are like this as well.
I can agree with that one @I AM ERROR
relevant, I think.
lol
Nacy Pelosi is a joke.
I tend to agree with Falko, for the most part
As journalism was infiltrated, civil society organisations were too .... legislatives listen to their proposals
I tend to agree with myself, but I'm skeptical even then.
but it's hard to comprehend a legal structure that would make that enforceable in a realistic way.
Unless I'm drunk, then I REALLY agree with myself.
In my mind: fund parties with tax money based on voting results and voter turnout, all policy proposals must be transparent to the average voters in what they do, why they do it and who proposed it
Already a problem with that.
I know
Tax dollars going directly to political parties.
That cements the current political structure.
We've had political parties die and be replaced in the past
nobody runs as a whig anymore.
I mean, unless you're getting joke coverage like the Rent Is Too Damn High Party.
Could factor party membership in as a) legal income for the party and b) a measure for how mich you get
That seems to assume people are voting straight ticket
Elections are a little more complicated than that.
Make political parties illigal.
Ban them.
Only vote for a person not a party.
I would be okay with that.
but still not enforcable.
And possibly unconstitutional.
I know I was joking.
I have not thought out every detail in the last 5-10 minutes 😁
Right to peaceably assemble and all
😛
Totally unconstitutional.
Oh, I believe that, Falko 😛
How would they get funding for election? US is a vast country, no national tv to be obligated to show their program...
Freedom of association yeah.
I don't see a third party ever working
But no, getting push back is the only way to refine an idea into something that works in the real world.