or a huge fine if they don't ..

That's literally unrealistic for social media sites to enforce but EU doesn't give a shit.

Even with the fines of censorship algorithms some stuff will just get past.

But props to EU..in their everlasting race to censor internet, they are going to wringle some $ out of it as well. Win win to them.

The EU must be an awful, awful place for a start-up tech company.

You'd be buried in onerous regulation from day one.

They probably don't know what a start-up is anymore

Win win until the internet says "well fuck you"

Watch EU companies start to only do online business in America.

The next world war will be fought through legislation on the internet

http://thehill.com/policy/technology/403384-house-gop-sets-deadline-for-twitter-ceo-to-decide-to-testify-report

"We do not shadowban according to political ideology or viewpoint or content, period,”

"....just based of hate-speech... which is dependent on political viewpoint. "

'We don't ban people we disagree with, we just put them in a container box so no one can see what they are saying.'

We didn't kill them, we just threw them into mass grave and covered with earth.

"we don't kill them.... we leave them on a deserted island surrounded by sharks with no way to get food"

"we are not responsible for them starving"

'I wasn't getting cucked, but I was present while my wife got fucked.'

"I'm not cucked, i'm supporting my wifes independence."

lol

I'm not being cucked. My wife will just leave me if I don't let her get railed on by other dudes in front of me.

"Don't call it a grave, it's the future you chose"

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/08/cybersex-toy-industry-heats-up-as-infamous-teledildonics-patent-climaxes/

Finely a story we can all get it on with.

https://youtu.be/asPo_lxcjKM

Here are the two articles Tim Pool covered today in his video on Trump tweeting about South Africa.
I’ve also included a picture containing both headlines. Archive links below.
http://archive.today/jpjwn
http://archive.today/AS4vN

Something I think @Timcast didn't mention (not calling him out, just saying) is that in all these robberies on white farms, nothing is stolen and the farmers aren't simply shot or bashed to death. They are tortured. If you take extra time to kill someone slowly or rape them before hand and don't steal anything then the narrative of it being a robbery is a bit far fetched I think

Yeah, and the government is directly stealing land from a specific race. Among other things. It’s pretty obvious, at least to me, that it’s a racial issue. But to be honest , I think his video was fair , and he did point out the media being hysterical about Trump .@Dunk Massive

Yeah his video was fair, I'm not bitching about it. Just something I thought was a big narrative breaker.
And it is undeniably racial based by admission of the president singing 'kill the boer' (boer is a white boy)

I’ve seen that video. Crazy.

Karma of making microphones and loud speakers *jk

Pretty sure Tim mentioned that some of the deaths are racially motivated judging by the gruesomeness or something like that.

Probably, my ears are as bias right as Tim's words are bias left.

(Not far left, not sjw crap, but left of centre)

But I think it was in the first video, yesterday not in the toadys morning one

I don't think I watched all of them. I've been following this SA thing for a long time so most of it is recycled news to me.
One reason I don't want to 'call him out' on shit I didn't watch

It seems to me that race is definitely involved in the level of brutality present in the attacks, but there's no real way to quantify that and determine objectively whether it is or is not a factor. It might not be a motivating factor but it definitely seems like an aggravating factor. Also the racial rhetoric coming out of mainstream politicians and public figures in South Africa is so shocking that I don't think western minds can really process it. Politicians literally singing and dancing while talking about killing people.

If it's perfectly normal in your country's public discourse to talk about killing people of other races then that has to have some sort of effect on the level of racial violence, even if the racial violence is merely a secondary effect of robbery.

If it's normal for politicians and public figures to talk about killing people of other races, then there must be very little moral consideration given to the lives of people of other races. And if the common rhetoric the robber hears is about righting historical wrongs and redistributing wealth that has been illegitimately concentrated in the wrong hands - *and they're literally robbing these people anyway* - then it's not likely that moral consideration is going to restrain the robber from what they have been led to believe are retributive acts of violence.

They're thieves, who have been told by authorities the people they're stealing from are terrible people who have stolen from all the people of the thief's race. It's easy for the thief to mentally frame the robbery in terms of righting an injustice. A punishment.

That's my theory anyway. Not that there's some organized government led campaign of racial violence, but that the common rhetoric used in SA is making thieves think they're not stealing from but actually bringing justice to the farmers.

^^^