I am curious why he would support it

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=706279549705113&id=112651575499

look at those dindus

https://www.foxbusiness.com/retail/amazon-cracking-down-on-employees-leaking-data-for-bribes

ya all still taking dick picks ah?

employees geting bribes to sell your data left and right

not only that same companies sell your data

:/

<https://rocketreach.co/ralph-blasey-email_7178049>
<https://archive.fo/bGxQf#selection-847.111-847.121>

https://yournewswire.com/kavqanaugh-accuser-brother-fusion-gps/

Kind of a 'Six degrees of Kevin Bacon' connection, but it seems legit.

http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/migration/migration.htm

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-europe-45542757?__twitter_impression=true

Ah, Left wing Kiddies protesting for bullshit

If people weren't so anti nuclear the coal thing wouldn't have been an issue

Problem is: There is only one good way to make electrical power and that is really expensive and intrusive.

You in the US have dozen of those

And that is water power

I'm not American. My province runs primarily on Hydroelectric though yeah. However nuclear power was doing well as far as I could tell

Then you spent billions shutting that shit down only to return to coal

No, its disadvantages are so severe that it shouldn't be anoption

The radioactivity is a Problem that isn't solved.

so basically the Taxpayer pays for the disposal of the radioactive waste.

Sorry, but the only two places it's been an issue were a result of lazy engineering and no safety features

And I heard storys from my Teacher who was a Fan of Nuclear Power - until he went to a Nuclear Power Plant..

Meanwhile people are fucking your air quality and blowing up mountains for coal lol

Yeah, but the only viable solution is to build a Dam and Water Plants

That is the only good solution to creating power

The issue is that's only viable in certain areas

Geothermal is also good when it can be utilized but again that's not everywhere

Yes, that's the other solution.

But that's the only good things we have....

everything else is shit or worse

ya all goign to spend billions shuting coal to go back to nuclear soon

never to realise you are doing the biding for the ones behind coal and nuclear energy

clearing the market for other to come and fill it

@Stefan Payne look up the 'integral fast reactor' and fast breeder reactors in general. solving the waste problem is mostly a political issue, not a science or engineering issue.

tl;dr reactor designs exist that burn the fuel more completely resulting in far less waste by mass, and far, far less dangerous or long lasting waste.

Fast Breeders like the Tschernobyl one?

https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/syria/.premium-blasts-heard-in-syrian-port-city-lattakia-1.6489630

I think comparing a RBMK to a modern western designed reactor is kind of disingenuous.