Message from @pratel
Discord ID: 511364954016972801
were Zerg jewish?
or the burning legion?
or..any large groups of enemies in Video games
Ahahaha. This whole thing is such a love letter it's actually hilarious. I think this is completely delusional. Anyone else's thoughts?
"
She has decisively to win those Iowa caucus-goers who have never warmed up to her. They will see her now as strong, partisan, left-leaning and all-Democrat—the one with the guts, experience and steely-eyed determination to defeat Mr. Trump. She has had two years to go over what she did wrong and how to take him on again.
Richard Nixon came back from his loss to John F. Kennedy in 1960 and won the presidency in 1968. He will be the model for winning again. Mrs. Clinton won't travel the country in a van with Huma Abedin this time, doing small events and retail politics. Instead she will enter through the front door, mobilizing the army of professional women behind her, leveraging her social networks, and raking in donations. She will hope to emerge as an unstoppable force to undo Mr. Trump, running on the #MeToo movement, universal health care care and gun contorl. Proud and independent, this time she will sideline with Bill and Mr. Obama, limiting their role to fundraising.
The generation of Democrats who have been waiting to take over the party from the Clintons will be fuming that she is back and stealing their show. But they revealed themselves to be bungling amateurs in the Brett Kavanaugh nomination fight, with their laughable Spartacus moments. She will trounce them. Just as Mr. Trump cleared the field, Mrs. Clinton will take down rising Democratic starts like Bowling pins. Mike Bloomberg will support her rather than run, and Joe Biden will never be able to take her on.
"
https://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-will-run-again-1541963599
Note: the authors of this op-ed are Hillary staffers.
I wonder if Tucker Carlson's son would be protected from charges under the Fighting Words Doctrine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fighting_words#United_States
Also note how the original doctrine was inspired by someone being called a "damned fascist ".
That Hillary stuff is bullshit. Dems won't do it. Not when she keeps shooting herself in the foot.
There are definitely Hillary partisans. Millions of them. But not tens of millions. Not nearly enough.
@Schedrevka I wouldn't be surprised. Throwing wine is rather low on the list of things that people care about that qualify as assault (lower than spitting, which people get away with all the time). Southern culture is also more tolerant of fighting words defenses (if this applies in Northern VA, I'm unsure).
Realistically, if it goes to jury, it'll end up being politicized at this point. If I were Carlson or his son, I'd be looking into good appeals lawyers who could try and potentially nullify a hostile jury.
Cat, since when has the lack of democratic support stopped Hillary Clinton?
It didn't in 2016. She'll just use her political blackmail to rig the primary again.
The superdelegates will be less of an issue in 2020
This will make it much harder for the will of the primary/caucus voters to be supplanted by party zeitgeist
Hillary also managed the impossible - losing to Donald Trump
The man reveled in grabbing crotches and still managed to take the rust belt. Her shame should make Michael Dukakis' look like accidentally spilling some coffee on a table.
That'll happen when it's patently obvious that you're way more corrupt than your competitor.
So anyway, most democrats I know don;t want to hear about her ever again
And I'm sure if the DNC cared about the opinion of their constituents, that would be more than enough.
I'm pretty sure Hillary is a goner. She was a goner since 2016. The progressive activists have people higher up the oppression hierarchy that they prefer for policy (Warren or Harris). The centrists have more 'centrist' candidates to pick (Bloomberg, who was elected mayor as a Republican). The majority of the Democratic base seems tired of her. She couldn't fill a classroom on her speaking tours and collected less speaking fees than even milquetoast politicians at universities.
She's well connected, an clearly has fans. But I expect the Democrats will probably dig out some far-leftie minority again (the activists seem to have a thing for "making history") that no one has ever heard of.
I've got a couple guesses of people it might be, but I'd rather not list names lest people get ideas. Let's just say, you probably have heard of this person by now, but never thought of them.
No Oprah.
Michelle Obama has about as much interest in partisan politics as I do
Cortez is the road to Trump's 50 state strategy. *maybe VT and DC might still vote for her*
Bloomberg could be amusing. The Dems run a billionaire dude that use to be a Republican against the Repubs billionaire dude who used to be a Democrat.
Honestly I'd like to see some rust belt or midwest moderate. Who's the gal who just won Kansas? It's a bummer she's so new.
Run Manchin. Brilliant.
"Honestly, I'm kind of sick of everyone's shit and wish you people would calm down and get to work."
Trump: "Seriously, after I win, name a cabinet position, it's yours."
After seeing how Trump treats his cabinet no sane and dignified human being would take that bet.
Manchin also knows he'd never be able to win blue state Dems. He's unique to WV, God bless him.
Why do you think he wants someone else so badly?
Manchin would be hilarious. If him and Trump didn't have politics getting in the way right now, they'd actually probably be good friends.
I don't see Oprah running, it's too dirty for her.
Cortez *can't* run. There's a legal age limit on the presidency that she doesn't match. I was actually concerned she could be the little 2020 surprise, but she can't be.
Bloomberg seems viable to me. But gun control would have to become a centerpiece issue. It actually could. Urban progressives love shitting on "backwards, racist, hick" rural voters.
Yeah, some states allow you to be on the ballet if you will turn the required age by the time of inaguration... many states won't let you on the ballet period.
President is 35. Cortez will be nowhere near that in 2020.
I thought 36
Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
Or so the website I pulled this off says. I don't have my pocket constitution near me at the moment.