Either way, if he did anything, he did what he had to do. Hillary would have meant the end of this country as we know it

I don't care if he went around the country changing the ballots himself

and for the last two years, the left has made it it's goal to reverse that outcome, and it's leading to their total collapse

Hillary would send me to die in a Russian intensity conflict

We have no business fighting Russia or China when we have all three been attacked many times by Muslim terrorists. Much bigger fish to fry, fish who don't give a shit what race, language, or nationality you are

seriously, if republican's don't sweep in the midterms and btfo these lizard communists, then it's their own fault

I think Trump is the first time the right has actually capitalized on the momentum of constant winning

because they literally have the entire deck of cards that they can run on and accomplish and

We have had economic warfare with China since the 90s

Every other time it's been a pendulum swinging from left to right to left again

We have economic warfare with a lot of people

Economic competition is healthy and natural

War is not

we need to press the advantage here, and completely destroy the left's capability to win

The left actually does a decent job of that on their own

Since they're fucking insane

their only platform is stuff the country doesn't want, and resisting an incredibly popular president given the circumstances

They can't even present their ideas in a sensible way. It's all "but muh Nazis"

nah its warfare not competition lmfao

Nobody is shooting at each other, and never will as long as our leaders have half a brain

can you imagine the storm that would occur if we won as big in 2018 as we did in 2016? flipping "secured" democrat seats, ginsburg dying, giving us a third judge on the bench? if they keep this insanity up, or intensify it as they keep doing, then we might get 20 senate seats in the fall, not 10

you should read a book called 'war without bounds'

actually the english name is 'unrestricted warfare'

china performing all strategies in that book today, and the bok was written in 1999 i believe

Economic competition. Not war.

disagree.

Aside from their inferior navy, nothing would stop them from fighting a real war, and winning it

lots of economic/industrial espionage conducted by PRC

LOTS

Yes, that is economic competition

like most chinese intelligence operations target scientific research or corporations in the defense industry with the intent of putting them ahead in the competition

Walmart and Target do the same thing

As do most governments

it isnt economic competition imo. hold on.

Sure that's a watered down term but war is too extreme

The only thing the PLA lacks is naval power projection because they only have one active carrier. Two more in production

Having been in the US Army myself anyone who thinks that PLA soldiers could not take us needs to go to rehab

Naturally I want us to be the best in the world but the reality is that man for man we are not

Doesn't the Chinese military have more troops than us?

Yes

We have the advantage of technology and combat experience.