Message from @hulton
Discord ID: 520873284850679819
This just all seems like conjecture
ALL of it?
again, ALL of it>
I’m not saying 1on1 messages didn’t happen
But the conjecture lies in what does that mean
For example
What does ANY of it mean
I have to take it with a grain of salt because they are releasing articles they WANT me to read and see
Even Slate called the MSN out for the mistake, "We Still Don’t Know Why Three Different Outlets “Confirmed” the Same Bogus Russia Story Last Week"
So it’s all bs?
I don;t think Trump being imcompedent and umprepared is.
hulton who is they?
Corporate media
dude
thats tens of thousands of people
at least
Meaning what?
They're all just empty shells looking to fool you?
Looking to fool me? I’m not fooled
Like I said I am just taking it with a grain of salt not gospel
but you could be, like anyone
including me
Look at an example above. An article correcting previous articles
and that is why I think that if Im gonna buy into something, the sell has to be convincing, and what's gonna convince me, are the details
give me the details
The MSN articels about Muller that have been comming out lately have been worded cryptically and havve been missing the words 'meddling' and 'collusion.'
and here's a detail that yo could help me with
Why do you want to be convinced?
con·vinced
/kənˈvinst/
adjective
completely certain about something.
concrete certainty
here's a detail that yo could help me with
But the media isn’t even certain
Sure go for it
assange proposes to DJT jr that now president Trump proposes Assange be made the Ambassador to Australia
wtf
I am at a lose for how the medi say there are no leaks in the Mueller Investigation, yet they know enought to interpit the finds of things not yet released.
This is why they are using more cryptic langue, if it sounds confusing and retrospect proves it to be wrong you cant tell if its a lie
cryptic? like 1337sp3ak?