Message from @hulton
Discord ID: 520872697551388684
Even 4 - 5 years ago, details emerging around Assange begin to erode the reputation of freedom fighters exposing corrupt governements, the Stratfor hack, and Iceland
How exactly are they able to obtain private chat logs on twitter between two people?
Twitter could just give them up
but
in this case
DJT Jr did
but again, investigatos have tools, like legislative tools, they can compell twitter to turn them over by court order
Didn't JR also have twitter DMs with Julian were they shared publicly available information, CNN or some miss read the date and though it was a smoking gun?
and Twitter could fight that
This just all seems like conjecture
ALL of it?
again, ALL of it>
I’m not saying 1on1 messages didn’t happen
But the conjecture lies in what does that mean
For example
What does ANY of it mean
I have to take it with a grain of salt because they are releasing articles they WANT me to read and see
Even Slate called the MSN out for the mistake, "We Still Don’t Know Why Three Different Outlets “Confirmed” the Same Bogus Russia Story Last Week"
I don;t think Trump being imcompedent and umprepared is.
hulton who is they?
Corporate media
dude
thats tens of thousands of people
at least
Meaning what?
They're all just empty shells looking to fool you?
Empty shells, many probably are
Looking to fool me? I’m not fooled
Like I said I am just taking it with a grain of salt not gospel
but you could be, like anyone
including me
Look at an example above. An article correcting previous articles
and that is why I think that if Im gonna buy into something, the sell has to be convincing, and what's gonna convince me, are the details
give me the details
The MSN articels about Muller that have been comming out lately have been worded cryptically and havve been missing the words 'meddling' and 'collusion.'
and here's a detail that yo could help me with
Why do you want to be convinced?
con·vinced
/kənˈvinst/
adjective
completely certain about something.