"Officers had no duty to protect Students"

well I say Government has no duty to pay their fucking asses then.

We're talking legal definitions here. There's a difference between thier "sworn duty" and a legal "duty of care"

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/techwatch/alexander-hall/2018/12/21/patreon-staff-change-rules-justify-banning-free-speech

is this true? after double down on their reason for banning sargon they re-invented another reason to justify their actions?

It is their fucking job, if you don't want to put yourself in dangerous situations don't be a cop. They don't get paid to sit on their asses and stare at Jail bait all day.

They are Antifa's preferred plattform...

i agree

https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2018/12/egypt-constitution-amendments-sisi-president-powers.html

an anyone clue me into the events of vidcon?

can*

Sargon went into Anita's panel

sat in the front row..

got called a "Garbage Human"

thats all?

Yarp.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r0F33CZ3lM&t=845s @caykoh

so they're now saying they banned sargon because anita insulted him for sitting at a public event?

that looks worse then the previous reason

umm i dont know, are they?

@A Haunted Army

erad the article and watch teh video, looks that way

link me?

scroll up dude

Naomi CrayZeeHair
RAW: Anita Sarkeesian Verbal Abuse at Vidcon 2017 Part 2/4 | Crazy...

that one?

well thats what i was replying to yes

read the newbuster article as well

Ah sorry I caught the one even further up

Yeah that one

but wouldn't adminitrative action like strikes/banning etc. from something like patreon be predicated on the individuals history? I jsut figure because if you get lets say a "strike", if another offense eventually rises, dont they see if theres already any 'strikes'?

sure, but when tht incident happened patreon said sargon did nothing wrong

My normie view: a panel person calls out an audience member (anita harass Sargon)
Intersectional view: Sargon by his mere presence is harassing Anita (victim stack order)

IIRC that's how anita framed the incident

I cant agree with the newsbusters chosen headline, and can't determine the article, other than one screencap, contains anything other than only hearsay. Did patreon issue updates to their terms since? It sounds like the guy Nuanced Bro on Twitter was given a reference to the vidcon event as an exhibit that was considered, which again, I would assume (maybe im wrong there) is a pracatice of any decision maker wether your giving out loan, firing an employee, or banning someone from your house....

@A Haunted Army

idk, i haven't done any digging into it either, i was just replying to what others had posted here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i12rFRbNYBk

Just got done reading quite a bit to gather up just whats going on with the Carl Benjamin episode, was rather uninformed about a lot of the history up until now. Is this guy honstly defendable for you guys? It seems like hes taken the career path of an aggitator, which is fine, but you have to do so expecting to take a few punches, sometimes deserved

However I would predict that he would respond that hes not an "agitator" , but maybe I am misjudging him on that.

Gonna go ahead and solicite some responses from anyone of different opinion on the matter here, lol, it sounds like Tim has a defensive position on the whole thing