Better Government than anarchy

Unless youre a dem or libertarian

If rebellion means seeking Congressional approval before putting the rights of the individual at risk, so be it

They rebelled before that

I know, but that's not the point

But it is?

Point is Abe's decision was unconstitutional

Not that the South got angry

South got angy before

And Abes decision would have happened anyways

You sure argue with me a lot for someone you have blocked boots

History isn't predetermined

It was in that specific case

You have to be patient with him. He has awootism.

You sure use weeb speak a lot too

*notices density* OWO

Really if you prove congress wanted something else Id cave

But you are argueing morals against law

President did it before Congress approval

Stop flipflopping on the timeline

Congress approved

So, we, the ones pointing out Lincoln had no authority to suspend the writ of Habeus corpus, are the ones arguing based on morals against law?

After Abe dug their grave

They could have impeached him if they wanted

Or not supported him

Or reprimanded him

But they’re corrupt politicians who only vilified the reason for the south’s secession. They only had their interests in mind.

Or not given him the right to do so again

There were other options

South were corrupt too

When the majority of sitting members are in the same party as him? Yeah they'll be adamant on a witchhunt lmao

Then why even complain?

Because it's fucking unconstitutional

Like I said this is a moral argument for you

It was decided to be constitutional

Legally

Lincoln had no right to declare war on states or block their trade routes.

Somebody explain to me how the violation of speech and personal freedom is constitutional

He didnt at the time

I don’t want to pile on and make this three on one but Lincoln’s administration was objectively the most harmful and despotic in American history