Message from @Ehzek

Discord ID: 486059968550666240


2018-09-03 06:22:42 UTC  

South got angy before

2018-09-03 06:22:49 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/444628704296173569/486058470026772480/image0.png

2018-09-03 06:23:01 UTC  

And Abes decision would have happened anyways

2018-09-03 06:23:31 UTC  

You sure argue with me a lot for someone you have blocked boots

2018-09-03 06:23:52 UTC  

History isn't predetermined

2018-09-03 06:24:13 UTC  

It was in that specific case

2018-09-03 06:25:00 UTC  

You have to be patient with him. He has awootism.

2018-09-03 06:25:17 UTC  

You sure use weeb speak a lot too

2018-09-03 06:25:39 UTC  

*notices density* OWO

2018-09-03 06:26:20 UTC  

Really if you prove congress wanted something else Id cave

2018-09-03 06:26:34 UTC  

But you are argueing morals against law

2018-09-03 06:26:46 UTC  

President did it before Congress approval

2018-09-03 06:26:55 UTC  

Stop flipflopping on the timeline

2018-09-03 06:27:07 UTC  

Congress approved

2018-09-03 06:27:21 UTC  

So, we, the ones pointing out Lincoln had no authority to suspend the writ of Habeus corpus, are the ones arguing based on morals against law?

2018-09-03 06:27:26 UTC  

After Abe dug their grave

2018-09-03 06:27:49 UTC  

They could have impeached him if they wanted

2018-09-03 06:28:05 UTC  

Or not supported him

2018-09-03 06:28:34 UTC  

Or reprimanded him

2018-09-03 06:28:35 UTC  

But they’re corrupt politicians who only vilified the reason for the south’s secession. They only had their interests in mind.

2018-09-03 06:28:47 UTC  

Or not given him the right to do so again

2018-09-03 06:28:58 UTC  

There were other options

2018-09-03 06:29:21 UTC  

South were corrupt too

2018-09-03 06:29:27 UTC  

When the majority of sitting members are in the same party as him? Yeah they'll be adamant on a witchhunt lmao

2018-09-03 06:29:43 UTC  

Then why even complain?

2018-09-03 06:29:55 UTC  

Because it's fucking unconstitutional

2018-09-03 06:29:57 UTC  

Like I said this is a moral argument for you

2018-09-03 06:30:07 UTC  

It was decided to be constitutional

2018-09-03 06:30:40 UTC  

Legally

2018-09-03 06:30:41 UTC  

Lincoln had no right to declare war on states or block their trade routes.

2018-09-03 06:31:08 UTC  

Somebody explain to me how the violation of speech and personal freedom is constitutional

2018-09-03 06:31:15 UTC  

He didnt at the time

2018-09-03 06:31:55 UTC  

I don’t want to pile on and make this three on one but Lincoln’s administration was objectively the most harmful and despotic in American history

2018-09-03 06:32:35 UTC  

He wasn’t necessarily an evil man but he was cucked by his evil cabinet members, particularly the secretary of war

2018-09-03 06:32:49 UTC  

I didnt say it wasnt

2018-09-03 06:33:06 UTC  

I said that in the end they won and upheld everything

2018-09-03 06:33:44 UTC  

But you think that makes it ok

2018-09-03 06:33:53 UTC  

Thats a moral question

2018-09-03 06:33:55 UTC  

Because they were in power and could do so, doesn’t make it constitutional.

2018-09-03 06:33:59 UTC  

Legally they did

2018-09-03 06:34:11 UTC  

There is absolutely no legal recourse