Message from @Boara

Discord ID: 492169084067381248


2018-09-20 03:00:31 UTC  

Nobody is saying pedophilia. We are referring to late teens

2018-09-20 03:00:40 UTC  

However, 15-16 and mature is consensual.

2018-09-20 03:00:48 UTC  

define mature?

2018-09-20 03:00:51 UTC  

There is a reason why we can reproduce starting at puberty. The idea of not being mentally developed enough to have sex until age 18 has not existed until the last hundred years. Reeks of post-modernism tbh

2018-09-20 03:00:55 UTC  

Who determines what is mature

2018-09-20 03:01:02 UTC  

Mentally or physically mature?

2018-09-20 03:02:07 UTC  

When people died in their 30s it made sense to have children at 15. Now we live to be 75.

2018-09-20 03:02:09 UTC  

testing

2018-09-20 03:02:14 UTC  

super lag spike

2018-09-20 03:02:52 UTC  

Maturity is a hard concept to define because it varies from culture to culture.

2018-09-20 03:02:58 UTC  

I've seen people in their 50s who aren't mature

2018-09-20 03:03:28 UTC  

Besides, if we live to be 200, would the age of consent rise to 50?

2018-09-20 03:03:37 UTC  

That's not how this works

2018-09-20 03:03:38 UTC  

At any rate it’s silly and grammatically incorrect to say a teenager having consensual sex is pedophilia

2018-09-20 03:03:41 UTC  

You think people should not have sex until marriage, I agree, but generally you must be 18 to marry.

2018-09-20 03:03:51 UTC  

Zero you're saying that because we had a shorter lifespan we had kids younger

2018-09-20 03:03:56 UTC  

Yes

2018-09-20 03:03:59 UTC  

Yet the age of sexual consent is 16

2018-09-20 03:04:02 UTC  

So if we had a longer lifespan we should have kids older?

2018-09-20 03:04:07 UTC  

What are you saying?

2018-09-20 03:04:13 UTC  

No, at 25 you're fully developed

2018-09-20 03:04:16 UTC  

I see NO correlation between lifespan and the age of consent.

2018-09-20 03:04:23 UTC  

You're pulling at straws.

2018-09-20 03:04:34 UTC  

Because lifespan and age of consent only correlated in the past

2018-09-20 03:04:43 UTC  

it never did.

2018-09-20 03:04:44 UTC  

you're trying to take something that happened in the past and apply it to the future

2018-09-20 03:04:45 UTC  

and it doesn't now.

2018-09-20 03:05:12 UTC  

Lifespan argument is completely bullshit because once people survived to age five, their life expectancy was pretty much the same as it is now, for the past 1000 years

2018-09-20 03:05:39 UTC  

^

2018-09-20 03:05:53 UTC  

People only lived in their 30s due to disease outbreaks.

2018-09-20 03:06:01 UTC  

and lack of immunity from massive amounts of immigration.

2018-09-20 03:06:10 UTC  

Native Americans lived to be in their early hundreds.

2018-09-20 03:06:22 UTC  

Immigration shortens lifespan because of disease.

2018-09-20 03:06:31 UTC  

Or it *did*

2018-09-20 03:06:34 UTC  

now we have vaccines.

2018-09-20 03:07:00 UTC  

You're wrong. The maximum lifespan hasn't changed, but lifespan has.

2018-09-20 03:07:17 UTC  

How biology works doesn’t change according to the current year. People are still able to reproduce after puberty same as they always have. The only thing that’s changed is this post-modernist moral outrage.

2018-09-20 03:07:20 UTC  

Gonna go play Total War: Rome 2, will look at this arguement later.

2018-09-20 03:07:23 UTC  

I've said all I need to say.

2018-09-20 03:07:29 UTC  

We have endless examples of historical figures living into their 70s and 80s and they were not considered abnormal