Actually, one exception. Larry Ellison owns a fighter jet. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/larry-ellison-owns-a-fighter-jet-yacht-racing-team-and-supercars-galore-so-what-did-the-billionaire-7873541.html

you are only technically allowed to, and it requires an absurd amount of paperwork

i think if you served in the military and get like twelve seperate permits you can own a tank

If you have enough for a fighter jet, you have enough for lawyers to sort all the stuff out quick

No, As I understand it has more to do with ITAR issues.

if your rich enough whats to stop you from getting an ICBM??

nothing

look at putin

Mostly you have to be able to show you aren't using it to wage war or acting as a straw purchaser for someone like Iran.

I mean, do you know anyone selling ICBMs?

and trump

You get a nuke, you get a nuke, EVERYONE GETS A NUKE

The AnCap way.

I WANT TWO THANK YOU VERY MUCH

truly

But seriously, nukes are basically impossible to build and you won't be able to buy one.

i mean, russia misplaces them often enough, its probably easy to get a nuke from them

oh def its not realistic

You cant nuke me, you’ll violate my NAP you commie

but funny though

I'll nuke the NAP with the first one and then nuke you, checkmate

i used the NAP joke yesterday in response to a friends post in another discord

we already live in an ancap world

its the internet

they just don't like where it eventually evolves to.

Don't follow.

But whatever.

You can’t nuke my NAP, it has super magic armor. REEEEE

ancap, if you think about it, is where civilization started. The first person to trade with another. It all eventually lead to here.

I think you're using very broad definitions of alot of things. But that doesn't really matter.

I don't think the world is exactly AnCap anymore.

Look at a light infantry regiment's TOE, A few trucks with radios, Assualt Rifles (STGs), Light Machine Guns and or Machine Rifles (LMG /MRs), body armor and helmets, what is so unreasonable about that?

not anymore, no, probably not. I say we live it because all it is basically advocating, is hitting the reset button on all of civilization. Not in a violent way. But there is nothing stopping us from ending up here again.

with all the advances in tech, we have not solved the main problem that lead from ancap to here: The human problem.

break down civilization back to our basic family tribes, nothing stops history from repeating itself

I'd disagree. There have been ideas that have reached basically everywhere.

You'd have to get rid of those ideas.

And the techonologies.

you have to get rid of a lot of ideas to get to ancap

If you wanted to reset civilization in that way.

then you need to keep them from coming back